i only have posted the features that i have seen confirmed by comodo staff. i have not seen anything about the firewall but that doesnt mean that nothing is being added or changed
Any information will be passed on to the forums as soon as it becomes available,don’t worry folks.
My personal thoughts on Lordraiden’s query.I’d expect the local BB to be incorporated within D+ given that it is, in effect,an “AI HIPS” functionality.
The UI should be restructured and redefined from it basis.
Version 5.8 was only a color change. Please tell me that you are throwing away that UI.
CIS needs to have BUTTONS instead of “links” (for example).
I mean “links” because to access a configuration, you have to click an blue underlined text.
Its looks so much like HTML. The current icons also need a lot of detailed work.
BIG BUTTONS are now the trend. Configuration should be accessed easily and not from a link/text with the explanation of what that text/menu does. BUTTONS and LABELS are intuitive if they are build correctly.
Maybe COMODO needs to invest a little bit in an Art Design Department? ;D
Isnt it Behavior Blocker some kind of “Heuristics”?
Incredible, impatient to try new CIS :rocks:
What about the people who use AV? Like some dont use CAV, some dont use D+.
I think BB should be in AV. D+ is strong & people who know how D+ works dont need BB in a way. But BB in AV will be kind of zeroday malware protection for people who use only AV.
Thanxx
Naren
I think, BB should be add to the antivirus, Because BB is a kind of detection but D+ is prevention.
also if D+ been disable should be active all detection modules> So detection modules should be among AV. it’s possible some CIS users don’t use D+ but AV is active always.
Actually I love the CIS 5.x GUI… it’s simple and has a very good overview… Not like kaspersky,norton,…
Yes also you are ritght, probably the best for all would be to make it independent of the rest of the suite so you can choose to install it in any version
I agree with this. But somehow, I have this feeling that it should be able to “incorporate” itself somehow in the suite should both be present in the system. I have no idea why I have this feeling. I can’t explain it.
BB can be a module like FW, D+ & AV. This way it can be used with any module with custom install.
Thanxx
Naren
I don’t see it any other way :-TU
That seems like the best option.
i have been thinking about the BB and i wonder how it will work. Normally behavior blockers monitor processes already running in ram. then when it detects suspicious activity it alerts the user. cis doesnt work this way if its unknown it gets sandboxed. i wonder if the BB will monitor the sandbox only or everything (sandbox and ram)
what do you guys think
for people who dont know what behavior blockers are here is a good description
In its simplest form, behavior blocking monitors file activities, preventing certain modifications to the operating system or related files. For example, behavior blockers may monitor the system registry, and warn users accordingly if a file being executed is attempting to modify it. Some programs, of course, do this legitimately, i.e. a SETUP program.
here is the article
hopefully the comodo BB will not generate to many FP’s. Melih said it is flexible so this makes me wonder ???
we mods know a little about how it is going to work and no one that I know of out there has a BB like comodo will have.
I understand that you can’t say too much but please don’t patronize us (even inadvertently) with ‘spin’.
but that could be good or bad. will it actually be powerful/effective from what you can tell
no spin, what they plan to do I don’t remember seeing it on any other program out there, and remember I have tested basically all of them.
from what I know if they implement it right it should be very effective.
hmm this makes me really curious to what they came up with. there are very few behavior blockers that i know about and there is only one decent one, mamutu, but it still isnt even that great. so this makes me wonder what comodo came up with.