the one that the cis installer sets is the older version of secure dns. this version is the new version which now includes a content filter and is run by dns.com. idk when but siteinspector is also going to be integrated into the dns
Hi,
unlike on my PC, on my router there are 3 static DNS entries but only 2 Comodo DNS servers. It keep putting the primary Comcast CNS server in the last static DHS server slot. What should I do?
dev
What if you leave the third position blank?
It won’t actually utilize the third address unless the first two aren’t responding, anyway. I wouldn’t be too worried about it.
If I leave it blank the router automaticaly puts the Comcast dns in there.
dev
Why do I get UnKnown for a DNS server name?
nslookup
Default Server: UnKnown
Address: 8.26.56.26
dev
Hi,
Something strange. Before I installed CIS 5.8 Beta (latest) when I booted up Windows 7 my network came up almost immediately and I could get access to the internet right away. After the installation it now takes up to 5 minutes for the network to come up. It just sits there spinning then finaly comes up.
I noticed that CIS installed the older DNS servers in the TCP properties so I changed those to the new ones listed here directly on my router as instructed. Then changed the TCP properties to automatic DNS as instructed.
No change. I then reapplied the Comcast DNS and that fixed the problem. Now with years of experience I know changing DNS servers should have no bearing in how fast my network comes up but all my tests point to that. I realy want to use the Comodo DNS and probably will and just deal with the slow bootup. I was just looking for any ideas or experiences.
Thanks,
dev
Warning: Unsafe Website Blocked!
www.google.com.ua
This website has been blocked temporarily because of the following reason(s):
SearchEngine, OperatingSystems, HACKING, MOBILE
This site contains links to viruses or other software programs that can reveal personal information stored or typed on your computer to malicious persons.
WTF?? blocked GOOGLE!!!
unmark HACKING in my dns.com accaunt for my network and google is open!!!
google is HACKING???
does google provide access to hacking if you search for it? and all the cached’ documents etc?
Yeah, but hacking sites should be blocked, not google just because it provides access to them. It also provides access to many, many legit sites.
It’s like refraining driving cars, because sometimes you can be in accident.
cached websites by google?
Warning: Unsafe Website Blocked!
This website has been blocked temporarily because of the following reason(s):
OperatingSystems, HACKING, ART, MULTIMEDIA, ADULT
This site contains links to viruses or other software programs that can reveal personal information stored or typed on your computer to malicious persons.
OMG!!!
Actually I have to agree, on youtube you can find adult videos, about hacking and that kind of stuff.
I agree!! but…
ok i set blocked categories for my network to - Low!!!
will not help - in low unmark adult. I abandon only sex drugs and proxy - I hope all will be in a chocolate.
morphiusz speak russian or ukrainian??
what differs this dns from 156.154.70.22 156.154.71.22?? in that do I can to influence defence choosing certain content, or there are yet what differences…??
I don’t speak none of above.
These DNS which you posted are “old” ones - you won;t get content filtering, only malware blocking by default.
8.26.56.26/8.20.247.20 are DNS ver. 2 with content filtering etc.
http://moda-2011.ru/ fishing site!!! why not block???
I guess that you can report it here: http://dev.recursive.dns.com/app/exceptions/
Is there a way i can test how fast comodo dns is for me? compared to dns advantage that i use now, without having to install anything?
Domain Name Speed Benchmark (portable, not installed)
Will the current DNS servers still be used, when this beta replace the current one? Because i got these results. ![]()
Comodo DNS Comodo DNS BETA
156.154. 70. 25 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%| 8. 26. 56. 26 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------±------±------±------±------±------+ ----------------±------±------±------±------+
- Cached Name | 0,022 | 0,024 | 0,028 | 0,001 | 100,0 | - Cached Name | 0,039 | 0,102 | 0,392 | 0,104 | 100,0 |
- Uncached Name | 0,024 | 0,108 | 0,333 | 0,090 | 100,0 | - Uncached Name | 0,041 | 0,148 | 0,392 | 0,104 | 100,0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0,024 | 0,086 | 0,186 | 0,053 | 100,0 | - DotCom Lookup | 0,049 | 0,119 | 0,205 | 0,052 | 100,0 |
—<-------->—±------±------±------±------±------+ —<-------->—±------±------±------±------+
156.154. 70. 22 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%| 8. 20.247. 20 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------±------±------±------±------±------+ ----------------±------±------±------±------+
- Cached Name | 0,022 | 0,024 | 0,029 | 0,001 | 100,0 | - Cached Name | 0,039 | 0,103 | 0,391 | 0,096 | 100,0 |
- Uncached Name | 0,024 | 0,115 | 0,340 | 0,094 | 100,0 | - Uncached Name | 0,041 | 0,152 | 0,677 | 0,129 | 100,0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0,024 | 0,075 | 0,135 | 0,039 | 100,0 | - DotCom Lookup | 0,049 | 0,112 | 0,203 | 0,047 | 98,0 |
—<-------->—±------±------±------±------±------+ —<-------->—±------±------±------±------+
(and thanks for the link Jahn :))
[attachment deleted by admin]