It’s easy to see and understand, do not take a genius. If a person is interested in improving the product (he plans to use it) - is constructive criticism, with concrete proposals, if not interested (he does not plan to use it) - is just throwing mud.
Melih, you’re so optimistic maximalist - it created the first positive impression of the company and products. Now, with the release of the new version, for me personally, the balance will tilt to the side of the cis - I tried NIS 2011 and only Norton Insight left a positive impression (technology has great potential for automation of decision-making).
PS: and do not relax, new heated debate expected in the next round of beta testing
For such a concept the future. Securite suite, born from anti-virus and contain it as a core architecture, will die over time if not able to transform itself. This is my amateurish forecast. 88)
Ahmed and all the others who are confused by the quality of the signature detect, you must understand once and for all - CIS is not an antivirus. If you want antivirus, take Avast, Avira, Panda Cloud they free too, but you will never be completely protected - it is simply impossible.
You just have to understand that 99,99% detection doesn’t go too well with noob user operating such program. You can have HIPS that is 100% (assuming user decisions are always correct), but you have to answer bunch of dialogs just when installing something basic. If you want to make it more user friendly, you have to sacrificy something.