In the technology. Since version 2.6 to 2.8 and now 2.9, I can see a performance degradation. Light, but perceptible. Not exactly on computer usage but rather in slow, very slow, restoring snapshots tasks. The “restore in seconds” is history now
Other very unbelievable sad point is the disk usage. On version 2.6 and 2.8 we can see hundreds of snapshots. Now, the intensive use of CTM (like an hourly snapshot) takes all the free disk space. Worse, what seems a bug, is that deleting the snapshots does not recover the space!
The concurrence talks about 60.000 snapshots of particular files… I can’t achieve 50 with CTM…
The timeline of releases is incredible slow… There is the same beta for months! Also, the contact and feedback of the developers are almost null :-\ A lot of problematic bugs aren’t even commented by them >:( I have BSODs never explained by CTM team… Just “this will be addressed in the next version…”.
Comodo seems to be interested on CTM some months ago but not anymore. Seems a abandonware product and I’m seeing the day I’ll see it in the Discontinued products board
I’ve translated CTM and was deeply interested in its development. Now seems that everything is going to dead or hibernate or continue as a live-dead product. I’m frustrated with all of this.
This thread seems to be dead in some days… if it receives the same treatment of the code development… I’ve defended the product in quite some forums… Now I’m regretting as it’s seems a dead product…
yup tech it doesnt seem like this program gets the backing(attention) it needs to be a great program and your right it takes a long time to restore a snapshot in the latest beta(i uninstalled).seems like everything goes into cis.
Yeah. The technology is very interesting. But the implementation is what counts here.
I understand the policy as CIS is the leader product. But the user feels disappointment about this… There is a board about “what product develop next”… They say that the development teams are independent… Why is this happening then?
What makes me think that the technology has changed is this:
In 2.8 and earlier version, rebuild MBR is equal to uninstall CTM to baseline.
From 2.9, rebuild MBR is equal to uninstall CTM to current status.
I haven’t tried 2.9 but from what you are saying here, sounds to me like they are getting it more in line with Eaz-Fix and RollbackRx. Both of those products exhibit the same two symptoms you describe above. I have a license and will not use their products because of what you mention.
There are other evidences of the “problems” of changing the technology.
The free space management is completely strange now.
I could take a lot of snapshots before. Now the space is quickly took by the snapshots.
Worse, deleting the snapshots does NOT recover the free space…
What’s going on?
Why are other companies facing the same problem?
They’ve started with the same code, but after that each one has its own… Am I wrong?
Why do they change the technology?
with Disk imaging solution I can recover my full HD in 10 minutes
but what’s going on with CTM? I’m already aware that COMODO got the source code from Horizon Datasys.
I don’t want to believe this but are the CTM team just follows EAZ-FIX family source and changing UI to this fancy CTM’s???
were they just theme maker???
CTM is BSODing my computer. Probably a conflict with some other low level driver.
But I can’t help without a dump (CTM avoids the saving of a dump).
Seems it’s time to move to another technology solution.
I’m about to give up on CTM…
Since I had a near disaster uninstalling 2.8 I have not installed it again on my new Win7x64 machine. I am waiting for information before trying it again.
Yes, in 2.9, reset baseline and uninstall to current system in seconds, at the same time, the restore speed has been obviously reduced. We will improve the restore speed in the next version.
...
4) Comodo seems to be interested on CTM some months ago but not anymore. Seems a abandonware product and I'm seeing the day I'll see it in the Discontinued products board....
