FLS is Comodo it self(The AV Guys adding to Safe or Malware) but there is no Comodo Valkyrie Provider
This explains why everything related to malware with CIS is different from XCITIUM.
Xcitium uses Valkyrie yes and the Providers are FLS(Xcitium),Valkyrie,Administrator and User Rating
This is how Xcitium File Rating Looks like
And CIS does not have Provider: Comodo Valkyrie and they said it will be and yet its still not???
@Melih Why in CIS 2025 There is no Comodo Valkyrie Provider in FILE RATING Section???
You said that Comodo Valkyrie will be in Comodo 2025 and yet its still FLS(Comodo)
Now you understand that those who use CIS will not be protected like XCITIUM since we do not have Valkyrie.
That is why the malware database is fed and reaches XCITIUM but not CIS.
Since CIS does not have Valkyrie.
My only point in this topic is I bet all of those 13 are still sandboxed (Contained) even without there being a signature which was my point in previous posts.
Yes they are sandboxed and waiting for Comodo analysis
Detection Rate for Comodo is 98.1%
@New_Style_xd Told you that @FlorinG Is blacklisting them
Just to show you this is todays samples and Comodo has achived 99% Detection Ratio
@New_Style_xd What do you say now?
The results are improving.
Talking here with all of you, it is very satisfying to see that things in the CIS are going better than in 2024.
I can see from your test that it’s going very well.
I’m going to do mine to see if it hits 98%
What I’m saying is that what came out on this site today is still not being detected.
i grabbed the latest malwares from the same site but Index of /malware-bazaar/daily
Very good my friend.
Let me ask you a question.
If I import these files into Valkyrie, will I, who use CIS, be protected? I don’t think so because CIS doesn’t use VALKYRIE, right?