Dear cruel sister, I kindly ask you to explain to me why Xcitium Client Security, configured to the maximum, did not protect the system against the same Chest of Drawers killer exploit.
1 Like
Can anyone tell me about this issue that I did a few days ago.
Before the value was 71335.
Today it is showing a lower value, as if it had reset.
Can anyone tell me if this is normal and why it happened or is it just another bug?
Hello, the above post is from a virtual machine that I have.
On the real machines it is at 71335, it has been 10 days and it has not changed,
Why is it like the images I posted above on the virtual machine?
I updated my real machine and it is still frozen at 71335, but on the virtual machine it is at 22
What could this be?
Are you not tired of whining yet? You forgive me, but I’m tired of it!
What difference does it make to you what is shown to you when it is more important what is actually in CIS servers? And there is exactly the number that is accumulated on the current day, and what comes to you is a fiction. Do not waste time on nonsense, please, you have become too much here … For all (almost everyone), CIS works almost without problems, and you have a new problem every day. How much is it possible? Maybe you will go to another antivirus?
2 Likes
Hello friend,
I like CIS antivirus, that’s why I’m here asking about it.
I wanted to know if it’s a problem with me or a BUG.
I’m just asking questions like any other user with doubts.
This is a nano-problem, forget and throw it out of your head.
71362 shows me.
I understand, but this result still appears here for me, I’ll wait until tomorrow.
To see the result. Thanks anyway.
Both Xao_Fan-Tzilin and I gave replies to the version number as requested, is there any news yet when the internal updaters will start working to bring all users up to date ?
1 Like
As an ex-developer many years ago, when beta testing and a single user has so many problems that no one else has I could guarantee it wasn’t a problem with the code…
Hello everyone!
Is this happening to anyone here at your CIS? Is it blocking VIRTKIOSK.exe, which is part of COMODO itself?
I find this very strange.
What’s more amazing is that it is marked as trusted
1 Like
Hello dear New_Style_xd, I have exactly the same problem. I asked C.O.M.O.D.O_RT, but he said that they have no problems. And it’s a shame that I can’t run a virtual desktop in CIS.
1 Like
Here is the link :C.O.M.O.D.O_RT
Comodo Employees
22d
Hello, Nick.lucky,
We tested all the configurations and found that vd works perfectly.
However, we will check again and let you know.
Thank
you C.O.M.O.D.O RT
1 Like
In your case, to run a virtual desktop on the CIS.
You need to change it as shown in the image below, setting it to INTERNET SECURITY.
Because if you have it in Proactive mode, the Internet will not work on the Virtual Desktop.
I thought VIRTKIOSK.exe was and Run Virtual Desktop was the same technology as Comodo Secure Shopping which isn’t being further developed. If you are wanting to browse within a secure environment, simply right click the icon and run in comodo sandbox 
I don’t know why it’s still a feature in the UI but yeah, given that I’m prompted for Silverlight which hasn’t been a thing for years, it’s old CSS technology and running a browser in sandbox is just as effective 
But I don’t want to change the Proactive mode to “Internet Security”.After all, everything used to work.
“If you want to browse websites in a secure environment, just right-click on the icon and launch it in the Comodo sandbox,” So in Proactive mode I can launch the browser virtually? I checked that nothing is starting.Very, very, sorry
In proactive mode it will not work.
That’s why our friend @EricCryptid in one of his posts said what needs to be removed in order for it to work, but I haven’t done that on my machines. I’m afraid to remove it and it will cause problems.
What he said was that we have to remove this WINDOWS SOCKETS INTERFACE
Yes. Well, if you remove Windows Sockets Interface from the HIPS protected objects, which was a overkill fix for a containment elevation issue. One tip would be save/export your configuration and then remove the windows sockets interface and save/export it as a secondary configuration so you can just swap if you want to browse virtually.
Unforunately, we haven’t heard anything from the devs regarding this issue or much communication from them lately but it’s a workaround while still protecting you well. I haven’t got time to look into tweaks to that windows socket interface rule but possibly @DecimaTech might be able to provide a solution.
1 Like
It’s a pity
, but the main thing is HIPS, Viruscope, Firewall,Auto-container, they work fine
1 Like
но главное, что HIPS, Viruscope, брандмауэр, автоконтейнер работают нормально