I applaud that Comodo is seriously interested in developing a virtualization product. This endeavor truly interests me, however, COMODO DiskShield should, in my opinion, stop all development of “Virtual Drives” as a means to accomplish this or at least limit their use markedly. They are inconvenient, cumbersome, and just not a viable solution for “save - across - reboot” solutions for the average user. Virtual Drives will confuse many… needlessly.
I hope ya’ll the best but there are products available that dismiss the the notion of V-Drives. The ones I like are geared towards the “User.” The key is simplicity. Please reconsider the use of V-Drives as the primary way to accomplish “save - across - reboot”.
I know that a “save - across - reboot” solution is is the Holy Grail of light virtualization but it should (must) be easy and intuitive for the users and without the dependency of virtual drives. There lies the rub… None have found a reliable way yet.
I think we are making some amazing progress in such short period of time and what we release is not the end of development, but just the beginning! So keep your wishlists coming and you will the product flourishing!
It’s an amazing thing watching this in action.For a bit of amusement I installed Diskshield alone on an XP VM,then I proceeded to visit every dodgy site I could find,installing all manner of stuff in the process.I ran rogue applications(WinAV 2008) and as many keygens and activex downloads as I could find.It was utter chaos,pop-ups everywhere,then I rebooted…clean as a whistle,great stuff :BNC
I’d think that might be included in a later version,they’re concentrating on getting the basics right to start with.This is an extremely promising application so far (V)
Yes they do but before they start adding a load of additional features they need to make sure that what they already have is as secure and bug free as possible.