-“Comodo’s detection rate of 91 percent was second-highest in the current group”
-“Comodo’s rootkit handling was especially impressive. In several cases, it detected and eliminated rootkits strictly based on their sneaky behavior, without help from antivirus signatures. Like Webroot, Norton, and quite a few others, Comodo detected 100 percent of the rootkits”
-“Like the vast majority of current products, Comodo detected 100 percent of the scareware (fake antivirus) samples”
-“There’s even an option to have it replace Task Manager, so Ctrl+Alt+Del brings up the full power of KillSwitch. Clearly this is a tool to delight us geeks, not something designed for the average user.”
-“No Blocking, No Lab Results
Comodo Security Essentials doesn’t get tested by the big independent labs. That’s too bad; I’d like to see how it does. But many of the labs focus on static testing, and this product doesn’t attempt to identify inactive threats. Those that do test Comodo’s suite generally give it low marks.”
I hope CIS will have these cleaning-capabilities later so that CIS can get rewards; the main reason why it doesn’t get rewards is because of it’s cleaning capabilities is not good enough. AV-labs is one example
Really, then I don’t get a point “CIS needs to have more rewards”. I prefer to have a product with 50 mln users which is not overloaded with everything than 100 mln users product that it’s heavy and dangerous for novices.
Product A for protection.
Product B for cleaning.
You want A and B combined, but you are well aware that you will never need cleaning - it will be just heavy and useless. Av-test.org good results are not convincing at all