I get this “The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you.”, as well.
Anyway, so, it seems that also COMODO Memory Firewall, as a stand alone application, also vanishes in the horizon.
I must say that I, as an IT professional, dislike this attitude, as I would dislike any other security vendor from doing it. This talking about the security field. It would be same with other tools.
Resuming:
To get either the firewall + Defense+ or just the antivirus module, one needs to download the full package. No stand alone versions available.
Now, that COMODO Memory Firewall technology has been implemented into CIS, we also lose it as a stand alone tool. Not to mention that it is not an optional module, which means that if one wishes not to use Defense+, then won’t be able to use such protection. Am I right here?
The same will happen to COMODO BOClean. And, I’m guessing that, alike CMF, it will be just implemented and not be an optional module. Am I right?
I don’t see how this is the right approach. Perhaps, somehow I am confused?
My final thought:
I just hope all other security vendors don’t decide to go that way. I don’t think I need to be worried, though. I’m sure they’re aware that would lead them to a suicide road.
Bottom line:
If I decide to keep implementing COMODO Firewall + Defense+, now I need to download even more extras, just to get a few features.
Wrong approach.
I will see how things (CIS) will evolve, and decide later what path to go from there.
Regards
P.S: As I believe I already mentioned, nothing against such implementations. What I am against, is what is happening - killing the stand alone versions, and not releasing stand alone version of the antivirus, for example.
I also believe is worthless to say I wish COMODO reconsiders it, so I won’t waste my time on it. Lets just see what happens next.