Hey… its getting into an argument, I think.
I just brought out only a simple thing
Default ‘trusted vendors’ of CIS 3.8 should be shown as defined by ‘Comodo’
All the trusted vendors that are defined by the ‘user’, once it is installed in their computer should be shown as defined by ‘user’.
I think that strategy is fair than the present one.
Of course, we can delete the names from the list… Also, there may not be any difference between trusted vendors added by Comodo or User, as far as functionality for CIS Defense+ is concerned. But, the fact is all the default trusted vendors may not be known to all the users. (I have deleted two to three vendors, about whom I haven’t heard before).
We, as members and frequent visitors of the forum know of this… and the big list provided by users… but… the competitors or reviewers may flak this decision (of adding default trusted vendors as that of ‘user’). Also, somebody who use this software, but is not a visitor of this forum, may become sceptic of this strategy, as he may think that those vendors software can have free hand on their computer, especially if that vendor is unknown to him… though actually those softwares could be trusted.
Rather than criticizing Comodo my intention was just to bring to notice that it could happen outside this forum, thus, maligning Comodo. Rightly so, as due to the high quality products of Comodo being offered free… I think there could be many of them.
Any way, let the developers of Comodo decide what is best… Since, I am the OP, may I please lock this now, so that it does not get into a bigger argument.
CIS is a great product and let us enjoy its quality… Cheers.