TrustConnect Feedback [old]

To be clear, I got that using CTC.

Comodo says it is connected but I get the usual IP info so I thought it must not be working. What you say seems to confirm that.
Usual IP info? Comodo's or your assigned IP from your provider? The IP shown in my screenshot is Comodo's.

Hi cat,

I am trying again now.

Tray icon shows: Connected to Trust Connect assigned IP 10.200.1.74

Shields up shows:

Your Internet connection’s IP address is uniquely associated with the following “machine name”:

AMontpellier---------------177.w86-219.abo.wanadoo.fr

That’s weird.
You might try clearing out any cookies from GRC and disabling javascript…
I can’t hit it to test any further right now, the VPN server is giving me a “time to live exceeded in transit”.
ICMP TTL is set to 1?

I’m using Firefox and I do not keep GRC cookies. Disabled Java script but still the same result.

Disconnected TrustConnect and connected Hotspotshield (which asked for Java script to be enabled), then ran ShieldsUP again. This time showed my ISP connection BUT after closing Firefox to remove the GRC cookies just added, I restarted Firefox and ShieldsUP shows the HotspotShield connection.

I decided to try installing TrustConnect on my desktop XP SP2.

With that one I do get the IP change and no reverse DNS.

The laptop has vista premium and for now Norton Security with BOClean.

It still shows my WanadooISP on GRC.

I cannot understand what the difference is as TrustConnect shows green for both.

It almost sounds like a Vista/Shieldsup issue, have you asked Steve or posted on their forum grc.shieldsup at NNTP host news.grc.com?

Hi Cat,

I would doubt that as Hotspot Shield works OK.

I’m having the same problem as Gordon and I have tried James’ suggestion for the log in but to no avail. I’m running Windows Vista 32bit with BOClean, Avant AV, and ZoneAlarm (waiting for CFP 3). Any suggestions would be a great help. I’ve attached the log (atleast I hope I have, I’m new at this) in the hopes that it will help.

Thanx,
Michael

[attachment deleted by admin]

waeylander,
FWIW, I’ve trimmed your log down to the last line that’s the same as mine (apart from the HMAC Key) and put mine up for comparison.

[attachment deleted by admin]

cat,

I really am a newbie at trouble shooting things like this. I can figure out the basics and am learning more as I go along but I need more info. I really do appreciate you looking into it and trimming yours for comparison. I looked yours over compared to mine but honestly I have no idea how to use this info. If you can explain it to me great but if you don’t have the time that’s ok too. (:WAV)

waeylander,

I’ve never setup an Open VPN server so I’m not sure what it’s looking for from Comodo’s client. :-[
You might want to create a support ticket and point them to this thread and our logs to see if we can get an answer. No promises though as this is a beta product and we’re supposed to know what we are doing. ;D

FWIW, I’ve noticed reconnect attempts from mine seem to fail some of the time and am thinking the server isn’t handling my lease gracefully.

Melih, please see my previous post (Reply #14 dated October 28th). I have received neither a reply nor any comment. Can anyone clarify whether TrustConnect is supposed to work under 64-bit Vista? I still have no joy here.

We are working on 64bit version of TrustConnect. Hopefully it will be released by the end of this year.

iseletsk,

Thanks for the reply! Looking forward to the finished product!

Hi Cat,

I have removed Norton from the Vista laptop after a false positive and changed to CPF3.0.11.246.

I also reinstalled TrustConnect and it is now working fine. (V)

Thanks for your help.

Glad to hear you got things worked out.
Maybe you should submit Norton to the malware detection list. 88) ;D

LOL

Unfortunately after a reboot I am now back to the same as before with it re ShieldsUp.

Later last evening I could not even connect to TrustConnect, I am hoping that is just temporary.

Edit - I have tried to connect to HotspotShield also and I am failing with an error stating ‘Bandwidth exceeded’.

I have searched for anything on this with Google and have found this:

1) Disconnected (Auth Failure) 2) Disconnected (Bandwidth Exceeded)

The “Auth-Failed” message occurs when the server denies a connection request. This most often occurs because the user has exceeded bandwidth limits.

Any user that has used more than 10 GB will not be able to log in until their prior month of bandwidth usage drops below 10 GB.

As I am testing these VPNs at home, I am connected to the Internet via my ISP Orange France, with an ADSL. I am soon going away, so that is why I want the wifi security.

Now I don’t understand all this technical stuff, but I am beginning to think that the ISP may be blocking these connections, as I also saw something about VPNs bypassing sites blocked by ISPs. Is that possible?

First,

Thanks a lot ! It is a great Idea, and it works great ! It is fast, easy: excellent, really !
(:CLP)

I have just one comment: TrustConnect Client is in fact a “packaged” OpenVpn client, so I think that it should also be under the GPL v2 licence… (:NRD)

Just to tell you to be careful if it’s not your intend to open your project to the community…

bigjim

G’day,

Tried to use TrustConnect the other day and received the following;


Sat Dec 01 09:10:36 2007 us=250000 Control Channel: TLSv1, cipher TLSv1/SSLv3 DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, 1024 bit RSA
Sat Dec 01 09:10:36 2007 us=250000 [testvpn] Peer Connection Initiated with 75.127.65.162:443
Sat Dec 01 09:10:37 2007 us=484000 SENT CONTROL [testvpn]: ‘PUSH_REQUEST’ (status=1)
Sat Dec 01 09:10:37 2007 us=484000 TCPv4_CLIENT WRITE [104] to 75.127.65.162:443: P_CONTROL_V1 kid=0 [ ] pid=8 DATA len=90
Sat Dec 01 09:10:37 2007 us=718000 TCPv4_CLIENT READ [22] from 75.127.65.162:443: P_ACK_V1 kid=0 [ 8 ]
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 TCPv4_CLIENT READ [104] from 75.127.65.162:443: P_CONTROL_V1 kid=0 [ ] pid=28 DATA len=90
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 AUTH: Received AUTH_FAILED control message
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 TCP/UDP: Closing socket
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PID packet_id_free
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 SIGTERM[soft,auth-failure] received, process exiting
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PKCS#11: Removing providers
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PKCS#11: Releasing sessions
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 PKCS#11: Marking as uninitialized
Sat Dec 01 09:10:38 2007 us=156000 Closing Win32 semaphore ‘openvpn_netcmd’


Any ideas why I can no longer connect?

Ewen :slight_smile:

Hi,

I have one suggestion to improve TrustConnect:

It would be nice if the client could verify whether it is connected really trough the VPN.
It is quite important because, a route mismatch on the PC can simply bypass the VPN.
An expert can check the default route, etc… but a beginner will probably not notice whether there is problem…

A kind of traceroute or so could do the job.

Bigjim