Friend @Nik123 ,
I will not send the SHA-1 to this email because I do not use XCITIUM.
It is clear that Valkyrie is not part of the CIS, that is why I will not post it in this email because I know that the CIS will not improve if I post the SHA-1 in this email.
My idea is to feed the CIS Base.
From what I am seeing, it is far from being a reality.
What the XCITIUM team has to do is implement Valkyrie in the CIS, but as we have already seen, it will only be done through FLS.
Two identical products, according to what they say, have the same protection, but different bases, one with Valkyrie and the other with FLS. 
FLS is the official Comodo Rating so Comodo Staff rate the files through FLS or Comodo malware signatures
But the Valkyrie is much more efficient and better than the FLS.
or is it the same thing?
If itâs not the same thing, whatâs the difference? Can anyone explain it to me? 
Well Valkyrie it is better because it provides Static and Dynamic Analysis to determine if a file is good or bad but Valkyrie also has FLS
The problem is that, on the contrary, the CIS FLS does not have Valkyrie. 
Itâs just a sign that Valkyrie is taking advantage of what goes through CIS. All users who report malware through CIS are being fed by Valkyrie, but this doesnât happen the other way around. To say that it does is a lie.
Because CIS was supposed to have Valkyrie in the 2025 product.
Is this fake? Because account is new.
If it is not Fake, then the correct branding has not been given to it - Badge & Text stating COMODO Staff ? The Carlos1 is a fake COMODO Account
