Kaspersky AV 6 and CFP?

My subscription for BitDefender AV 10 expires in 2 months so I am making plans on either renewing my license or trying out Kaspersky’s AV since I’ve been hearing it is good. I’ve been pleased with the performance, security, and compatibility BitDefender provides but I just felt the need to try something new. I was wondering if CFP is compatible with Kaspersky AV 6? I tried searching here but no topics about it came up. So if there are users here who have KAV 6 and CFP installed, could you please give me feedback on how compatible they are with each other?

I’ve been to the Kaspersky forum and found a few topics regarding CFP there and the feedback wasn’t good at all. They said CFP is notorious for causing invader warnings with KAV 6. The forum people there were a bit rude and unhelpful. Maybe its the language barrier.

Here’s a link to one of those topics:
http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=16264&hl=

As far as I am aware CFP has no problems KAV… however, the opposite doesn’t seem to be true. KAV does seem to have problems with CFP. Given what’s been said… it is KAV detecting that CFP is doing something wrong, not the other way around… right?. Additionally, aside from CFPs update… CFP makes no connections itself, it just inspects what is going on.

In any event, IMHO, you should not let security apps scan each other, they should trust each other implicitly. After all, if you don’t trust one of them then you should not really be running it in the first place.

I think the best thing to do, is go to Comodo Support, register on their system & raise a ticket on this issue. This way, you should get an official response from Comodo. Please post any feedback you get here. Thanks.

BTW What version of CFP are you running?.. I couldn’t help but notice that CLPTray was running.

I used a free version of Kaspersky (AOL Active Virus Shield) and haven’t noticed any issues with this pair except the infamous cmdagent problem with DLL injection tracking. It registered thousands of requests per seconds to Kaspersky’s components. I suppose, it’s more CPF’s fault, than AVS’s as cmdagent is still hogging CPU after AVS’s uninstallation.

There is no need for rudeness.Generally the people who run these forums are complete amateurs there opinions are of no value.
This is not the case with Camodo.They are extremely helpful and they know what they are talking about,which makes it a joy to discuss problems.
I would not think twice about installing software,if that was the attitude of the forum

I have been running KAV6 and CPF for 3 days now without any apparent problem. Do note i am not using the on access monitor.

I have KIS with the anti-hacker off but everything else like the pro-active defence and stuff on… And I run Comodo (hence why the firewall is off) because I like it more. They work fine together.

btman

So, KAVs has a firewall-type element? Is KAV & KIS the same thing?

Hi , I just want to note, if it was a specific problem, everyone would most likely have it. Alot can depend on your XP firewall not set correctly, order of security installs, or another problem in the system whether directly related to CFP or not.

Paul

I’m getting mixed feedback from most people I talk to regarding the issue. Some other boards say there is a conflict between KAV 6 and CFP, others say it works. I guess I’ll just have to wait 2 months for my current antivirus to expire and try out KAV and see for myself. I was kind of hoping to avoid problems and extra work by relying on feedback about the issue but it looks 50/50 between the public. I just hope that when I do try out KAV 6 in the coming months, that it will not cause my PC damage that would force me to re-format and start over.

Hi again. I understand your frustration and it does seem it’s split decision. There must be a common ground no? What I think is Anti-virus softwares should have stuck to just that. Instead they get firewall like qualities embedded that just cause more clutter. No two ways about it, having securities that are simply good at what they do is all you need. No fancy stuff. I kid you not when I say I have had countless computers come to me with tons of viruses\trojans and usually NORTON. With the whole stuffy package, all the flare and glamour attached to this software, it does, nothing. I get so peeved at bloated softwares. That’s why I like CFP. It’s good looking enough without the bloat and does what it should. If in fact KAV has firewall like properties, or is beginning to get bloated, this is the beginning of the Norton saga. :o

Let me say it this way, it is up to YOU , no doubt of what you want to use and is your right. From a technical point of view, the more bloat the worse performance and issues with conflicts. I suggest using something that won’t bloat and works well. Try out CAV and see how it works…If not, Avast is far better than Kapersky and while some may argue this, I have had to use both on many computers, Avast will get rid of the viruses\Trojans where Kapersky has ultimately failed , not as bad as Norton but still. So i’m not being bias here, I don’t use any of the mentioned currently. My list would go as follows…

CAV-finds things very fast, free for life, sometimes buggy on some systems but doesn’t hog the resources of many anti-virus. CAV is getting better all the time and I think in not too long will be right up in #1 spot on many sites\pcs.

Avast free edition- not quite as fast as CAV, takes longer to scan, has free version for as long as registered but this has changed before with them may do so again. Will get rid of viruses where others have failed, has web monitoring, etc…

I haven’t worked with NOD32 much but according to most, it’s very good.

AVG free- very good too, but seems a bit week to me. I used to hear everyone using this now it’s scattered.

I’m sure there are a lot more but the top few are what shows results and that’s what I go by. I have to many times keep a system in-tact when removing all this garbage and as stated, if not CAV-Avast for sure. It simply works.

Still my opinion but hope it sorts some thing out for you. :■■■■

As far as worrying about re-installing, this is a chance you take every day you hook to the internet or start a pc. I am not being harsh but backing up a system and having a good back up plan is always best. That is no blame on software , it’s the user. If I don’t back up my info, it’s my fault. Any software can cause comotion on a pc and wreak havok, so plan ahead before using any software. (:NRD)

For the same price of Anti-virus you can buy Paragon drive image and back up the whole thing to a hidden partition and restore in 10 minutes. That’s what I use, absolutely excellent.

Hope things work out,

Paul

KAV= Kaspersky anti-virus, KIS=kaspersky Internet security, this includes spam and firewall. however if you install the on access monitor for KAV, there is some rudimentary firewall element installed with it, not a proper firewall more of a malicious traffic monitor, which can interfere with stuff.

So, if you’re running KAV/KIS with CFP and the KAV/KIS firewall component is active, then, in effect, you’re running 2 firewalls… right?

Well, sort off, the AV module is more of a malicious traffic monitor then a full fledged firewall, however Kaspersky is very modular, so you can disable or unisnall or not install it in the first place.