You can’t go on on a discussion if splinting it in 2 parts (one to be said “on topic” and the other “off topic”) before anyone is able to tell what the topic is.
The thread you created yourself is not a PM: everyone shall be reading it, giving still lesser chances to understand what in the beginning was ununderstandabe.
You are not fair either in quoting me only partially, what you modified in the said thread:
.. Now, [if the] OP [Original Poster] would be kind enough to tell us what [this] topic is [about].. [Thanks].
is not what i actually wrote, and no one has the right to claim he quotes someone when factually he does not.
This being said, and despite your later statement:
you seem to be saying that because you didn't understand the topic
noting that the 2 persons that ever commented (Blacklist and myself) didn't understand anything about what the topic was about, but implying that you did, the way you truncated my quote clearly shows the opposite: i am glad to see that everyone seems to agree about this evidence.
I have no personal feelings; to the question of Blacklist asking
Whats the point of this?
, and clearly asking for explanations, an answer not giving any details or the beginning of a comment but only stating
Do you have a problem with this
is definitely agressive street language in everyone words, not only with mine.
Last, and about the lack of moderation concerning a guy asking if a cheated keygen was or was not a FP, some people have been banned for less, while there effectively was a moderation in the thread you are referring to:
Shadha has every right to post whatever he likes here,if you don't find it of any use or interest,simple...don't read it!
while no one had done anything else then to use his freedom of speech in the respect of the forum rules.
No one ever writes anything in a forum (altough the lack of further intervention from shadha might be a precedent, and that you are yourself asking him to explicit what he means) if not wanting some reactions, including negative ones.
And, in the circumstance, i wasn't even negative, as there obviously is no topic and therefore nothing to talk about.
These were my only initial words, and would have remained as such or, in the opposite, would have seen me participate in some debate if shadha had started one after his initial statement, and altough it is a very unusual procedure: when people state whatever facts (and still more when they are subjective), they are always are assorted with a question, comment, opinion…
My further reaction was due to the fact that a moderator (if not thinking that someone tried to keep shadha from speaking, totally untrue from me), thought that no one had the right to comment what shadha said (or more exactly stated).
I did not make any fault, i fully respected the forum rules (and i particularly did not make any attack “ad hominem”): i don’t have to justify of whatever, and i don’t have, like i did, more or less then shadha to be told what i am free to write or not.