Depends…
I would want a server with a password for sometime… And with Battle-dust on, private if possible.
It support 32 only.
Depends…
I would want a server with a password for sometime… And with Battle-dust on, private if possible.
It support 32 only.
Ok.
A private server as you wish.
Does it(MW2) support Coop play like Operation Flash point 2(only 4 players limited to play Coop mode)does?
Operation Flash Point 2.
I’ve never seen this kind of stupid game before.
I feel like playing 10 years old Delta Force with HAVOK engine.
Graphic effects are lol.
Stupid AI bots.
Unstable connection.
It spreads UDP packets to everywhere and wait for the reply from the same IP range even if we don’t connect to the LAN.
Stupid main server.
We can use only a few weapons…not various.
Only 3 maps to play multi games.
They think we can shoot down the helicopters with Anti-tank rockets…we can but…
(The effectiveness is exactly same with RPG-7)
We need guided missiles.
What a game…
Thx… now the problem is when will you run.
Just to make sure we are on same page its a crysis server.
No idea.
That sounds like a cheap game.
Maybe the crisis discussion should continue in another topic.
Yes…
Creasy lets use ■■■
I check my internet speed in the site [link removed].My upload is 2.0mbps and download is 5.0mbps
speedtest.comodo.com VS speedtest.net
Who’s the winner?
Using my pipelined Opera 10.01 browser Comcast Speed Test measures 34.14 Mbps download and 2.66 Mbps upload speed, and SpeedTest.net measures it at 36.1 Mbps download and 2.4 Mbps upload speed according to my Bandwidth Meter Pro, but the Comodo Speed Test measures the capability of the Opera 10.01 browser at 11.20 Mbps download and 0.73 Mbps upload speed. After evaluating these results I consider the Comodo bandwidth measurement to be an anomaly and that they are probably using a more distant server than the local server I chose to use at Comcast Speed Test and SpeedTest.net which yielded much more accurate results.
~Maxx~
[attachment deleted by admin]
I would have to say that speedtest.net is the clear winner with more accurate results for more people.
Exactly! The more choices of servers that are offered for an internet speedtest the more accurate the results will be for all who use it.
~Maxx~
[attachment deleted by admin]
I agree with you guys except uploading test.
Speedtest.net’s Uploading test is :-TD.
I brought a new faceplate for my ADSL2+ service and my download speed is much better now
I’m happy with that speed and it all for £10 a month, unlimited download/traffic usage.
It varies by day (7MB-10MB) For some reason speed test .net is always a tad lower than what I’m actually getting when I download something, I.E CIS. Todays speed is 7.4MB.
http://www.speedtest.net/result/719995496.png
Does SpeedTest.net offer you a variety of servers in your area to try?
~Maxx~
CISCO rocks!!!
CISCO did it!!!
http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=31715
But…what about the estimated cost for the infrastructure such as laying wires, ISP cooperation, Community support? ???
Not really Only London and Dublin
http://www.speedtest.net/result/793384345.png
Big improvement! ;D
I’ve just got one of those mobile broadband dongles for Internet on the move, to say I’m only getting 2/6 bars, I think this speed is good, perfect for getting unfiltered Internet at college
I’m jealous.