Great job CIS!!

[wonderlust76]

Did you see this video guys??..CIS is been able to protect the system against a very dangerous ramsonware, even disabling automatic sandbox (I don’t know how…) :-TU

Worst Ransomware ever? | Satana unleashed

[ZorKas]

Hi,
Zero day simply by Comodo :-TU

[wonderlust76]

yeah…this one isn’t really a zero day: most of the scan engines can detect it…BDW, CIS can protect you because of its default deny architecture

[QSnap]

Yeah…
https://forums.comodo.com/news-announcements-feedback-cis/ransomware-vs-cis-fail-t116276.0.html

[Dennis2]

I am afraid unless you know all the details about the tests including the one quoted by the OP each test is by a unknown tester running unknown settings, also any reports of fails again unless you know the full details of how the computer was setup, both are of no use at all.

You either believe in the security software you are using to protect your computer or not.

All security software will fail at one time, unless the person sitting in the chair uses good judgment at all times.

Quote about one of the videos in the above quote topic prove that beyond a doubt.

@cruelsister post:8

Jon- regarding the AVGuru test:

This was a topic that was discussed a few weeks ago on Wilders and am surprised that it is showing up here. “EfficacyTest.exe” is a specific AV tester that when run will in turn run malware. If EfficacyTest.exe is allowed to run out of the sandbox ALL future actions will also be unsandboxed, thus the infections that can be seen in that video. In short, the setup for the test was very flawed and thus the results are also without value.

I was sent all of the malware seen in that video (the malware pack was PM’d to me) and the actual results can be seen here:

Comodo Firewall 8 4 vs Malware - YouTube

If you want to believe in any test at all, only officially run test are suitable giving all details of how the computer was setup to run the test.

Dennis