Dragon and Icedragon.

General Discussion (off topic) Anything and everyt
1

I have been using comodo dragon. I have comodo Icedragon installed on my CPU. I cam curious to see how many people use Comodo Ice dragon compared to Comodo Dragon.

2

i like them both but dragon has much better security.

3

I like Comodo Dragon better because it is based on the chromium.

4

“much better security” - what, where, when and how much ???

Dragon: Privacy and Security
IceDragon: Privacy and Security

(:s*) ScriptNo ≠ NoScript (:s*) (:s*) (:s*) (:s*) (:s*)

5

Well I should be able to vote twice becuase My dad like ID and I like CD lolz

6
7

I like CD more. It looks better & polished compared to ID. Even the icon of CD is better than ID. I dont know about the security comparison. But there are couple of features in ID I wish would be there in CD.

My Vote - CD

8

This is what i mean

9
[i]... [b]can be[/b] combined to a powerful [u]sandbox[/u]...[/i]

Dragon - 88) and where to find what is not there? (PPAPI (inside a process))

Sandbox - may be disabled, depending on distributor
link

10

PPAPI is there, and can be used by any PPAPI-plugin (currently used by Chromoting Viewer in Dragon).

Dragon-developers have not disabled it, so what is your point? (Do you know of any Chromium-distribution where sandbox is disabled by default?)
Sandbox can be disabled by the user too: –no-sandbox

11

I use them both and like them both. Only thing I DON’T like about ID is that you can’t sync it with other firefox browsers on other computer/operating system. This, I believe, is a real drawback. :frowning:

12

Удаленный рабочий стол Chrome - is evil >:-D

[dragon://plugins/]

NPAPI is there, and can be used by any NPAPI-plugin !!!

Dragon ≠ Chrome

Dragon-developers have not disabled it, so what is your point? (Do you know of any Chromium-distribution where sandbox is disabled by default?) Sandbox can be disabled by the user too: [b]--no-sandbox[/b]
Differences from Chrome

In addition, the following Google Chrome features are removed or disabled in Dragon:
…

  • Built-in PDF viewer and Adobe Flash Player which is sandboxed.
    …

  • Google Safe Browsing which blocks malicious and phishing sites.
    …
    etc.
    link

        Privacy VS Security  ???
13

PPAPI is there too, and can be used. There are very few PPAPI-plugins, though. I have used Chrome PDF Viewer in Dragon.

[url=http://www.cybersecurity.ru/net/157232.html]Dragon ≠ Chrome[/url]
True.
Differences from Chrome In addition, the following Google Chrome features [u]are removed or disabled in Dragon[/u]:
Dragon is not based on Chrome, it is based on Chromium.
- Built-in PDF viewer and Adobe Flash Player which is sandboxed.
Flash Player and Chrome PDF Viewer are not part of Chromium. It would indeed be great to have them in Dragon.
- Google Safe Browsing which blocks malicious and phishing sites.
[b]Phishing and Malware Protection[/b]. This setting is enabled by default in Comodo Dragon and alerts you if the website that you are trying to browse contains malware or suspected of phishing attacks.
https://help.comodo.com/topic-120-1-279-2558-Configuring-Advanced-Settings.html
14

:wink: True. Thanks for all the known information

Other browsers based on Chromium
Приложения, основанные на Chromium

https://help.comodo.com/topic-120-1-279-2558-Configuring-Advanced-Settings.html

JoWa

Principle WIKI know?
Dress frequently [edit]: “In addition, the following Google Chrome features are removed or disabled in Dragon” :slight_smile:

- [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Safe_Browsing]Google Safe Browsing[/url] which blocks malicious and phishing sites.
15

You’re welcome. I hope you did not expect me to provide unknown information. 88)

If you don’t trust Comodo’s documentation, test it: http://malware.testing.google.test/testing/malware/

16

I still like dragon over Ice but they are both very good… :love:

17

Are you talking about? 88)

Okay, changed my question: Features (functions) Google Safe Browsing will be removed or disabled in the Dragon ? True ??

18

Not to my knowledge.

19

https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware/
https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/?continue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Ftools%2Ffirefox%2Ftoolbar%2FFT2%2Fintl%2Fen%2Fsubmit_success.html&hl=en
https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://malware.testing.google.test/testing/malware/

logical sequence is not complete: GSB plus CSI minus CS DNS ≠ one for all Black List

 (  :(  не  гуд махорка)
20

I agree with you