I have been using comodo dragon. I have comodo Icedragon installed on my CPU. I cam curious to see how many people use Comodo Ice dragon compared to Comodo Dragon.
i like them both but dragon has much better security.
I like Comodo Dragon better because it is based on the chromium.
“much better security” - what, where, when and how much ???
Well I should be able to vote twice becuase My dad like ID and I like CD lolz
I like CD more. It looks better & polished compared to ID. Even the icon of CD is better than ID. I dont know about the security comparison. But there are couple of features in ID I wish would be there in CD.
My Vote - CD
This is what i mean
[i]... [b]can be[/b] combined to a powerful [u]sandbox[/u]...[/i]
Dragon - 88) and where to find what is not there? (PPAPI (inside a process))
Sandbox - may be disabled, depending on distributor
PPAPI is there, and can be used by any PPAPI-plugin (currently used by Chromoting Viewer in Dragon).
Dragon-developers have not disabled it, so what is your point? (Do you know of any Chromium-distribution where sandbox is disabled by default?)
Sandbox can be disabled by the user too: –no-sandbox
I use them both and like them both. Only thing I DON’T like about ID is that you can’t sync it with other firefox browsers on other computer/operating system. This, I believe, is a real drawback.
Удаленный рабочий стол Chrome - is evil >:-D
NPAPI is there, and can be used by any NPAPI-plugin !!!
Dragon-developers have not disabled it, so what is your point? (Do you know of any Chromium-distribution where sandbox is disabled by default?) Sandbox can be disabled by the user too: [b]--no-sandbox[/b]
Differences from Chrome
In addition, the following Google Chrome features are removed or disabled in Dragon:
Built-in PDF viewer and Adobe Flash Player which is sandboxed.
Google Safe Browsing which blocks malicious and phishing sites.
Privacy VS Security ???
PPAPI is there too, and can be used. There are very few PPAPI-plugins, though. I have used Chrome PDF Viewer in Dragon.
[url=http://www.cybersecurity.ru/net/157232.html]Dragon ≠ Chrome[/url]True.
Differences from Chrome In addition, the following Google Chrome features [u]are removed or disabled in Dragon[/u]:Dragon is not based on Chrome, it is based on Chromium.
- Built-in PDF viewer and Adobe Flash Player which is sandboxed.Flash Player and Chrome PDF Viewer are not part of Chromium. It would indeed be great to have them in Dragon.
- Google Safe Browsing which blocks malicious and phishing sites.
[b]Phishing and Malware Protection[/b]. This setting is enabled by default in Comodo Dragon and alerts you if the website that you are trying to browse contains malware or suspected of phishing attacks.https://help.comodo.com/topic-120-1-279-2558-Configuring-Advanced-Settings.html
True. Thanks for all the known information
Principle WIKI know?
Dress frequently : “In addition, the following Google Chrome features are removed or disabled in Dragon”
- [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Safe_Browsing]Google Safe Browsing[/url] which blocks malicious and phishing sites.
You’re welcome. I hope you did not expect me to provide unknown information. 88)
If you don’t trust Comodo’s documentation, test it: http://malware.testing.google.test/testing/malware/
I still like dragon over Ice but they are both very good… :love:
Are you talking about? 88)
Okay, changed my question: Features (functions) Google Safe Browsing will be removed or disabled in the Dragon ? True ??
Not to my knowledge.
logical sequence is not complete: GSB plus CSI minus CS DNS ≠ one for all Black List
( :( не гуд махорка)
I agree with you