CIS can block it for accessing the interprocess memory of explorer.exe.
And the zbot will terminate itself if CIS blocks this action.
mod edit: Split & renamed from here. kail
CIS can block it for accessing the interprocess memory of explorer.exe.
And the zbot will terminate itself if CIS blocks this action.
mod edit: Split & renamed from here. kail
I am not sure why did you mention explorer.exe
If there is any relevance please tell & clarify
Anyway, win explorer’s access to Internet can be if not must be (as in my case) disallowed - just create rule(s)
If any security caught and block a suspect - that means that the security is in charge - so after that neither zbot no any other cannot “terminate itself”… What that suppose to mean? (may I ask)
We are not talking about unique Flame that can deactivate itself & eliminate all traces of itself by receiving “kill” request from its controller server(s)
As for “if CIS blocks…” - sure, but that’s only “IF”. Zeus / zbot / & alike was known since 2006-2007 as far as I know, but just in 2012 (which is still “now” 88) ) we have around 5-6 modifications. Therefore - yes … “IF” ![]()
Finally, as in a few previous posts we are talking about one particular test
Cheers!
logs for the zbot
2011-11-09 22:55:53 C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Local Settings\Temp\0.028543354169504265exe Sandboxed As Partially Limited
2011-11-09 22:55:54 C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Application Data\Egriu\owwe.exe Sandboxed As Partially Limited
2011-11-09 22:56:23 C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Local Settings\Temp\tmpfcd49f63.bat Sandboxed As Partially Limited
2011-11-09 22:56:27 C:\WINDOWS\system32\conime.exe Sandboxed As Partially Limited
2011-11-09 22:56:27 C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Application Data\Egriu\owwe.exe Access Memory C:\WINDOWS\explorer.exe
2011-11-09 22:56:27 C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Local Settings\Temp\0.028543354169504265exe Modify Key HKUS\S-1-5-21-1004336348-1383384898-1801674531-1003\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones\0\1609
2011-11-09 22:56:27 C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Local Settings\Temp\tmpfcd49f63.bat Modify Key HKUS\S-1-5-21-1004336348-1383384898-1801674531-1003\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones\0\1609
2011-11-09 22:56:27 C:\WINDOWS\system32\conime.exe Modify Key HKUS\S-1-5-21-1004336348-1383384898-1801674531-1003\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones\0\1609
2011-11-09 22:56:30 C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Local Settings\Temp\0.16917603943976056exe Sandboxed As Partially Limited
Hello again a256886572008,
1st, red highlighted string in your last post
2011-11-09 22:56:27C:\Documents and Settings\Roger\Application Data\Egriu\owwe.exe Access MemoryC:\WINDOWS\explorer.exemeans absolutely nothing!
You probably do not install enough Applications if that one was any surprize for you
I do not care (at the moment) about owwe.exe / 0.028543354169504265exe / …
Could be or may not be a malware. If the latter & was caught - Bravo!
Did you ever looked into Defense+ events re “Access Memory”? (attached)
Furthermore
(forget about Comodo’s sandbox for a while, please)
You can get similar messages when installing legit Software. Are you saying that you’ve never seen that?
… hmmm … I can give many examples, but how about the following?
Etc. & so on…
“\Internet Settings\Zones\0\1609” zone stuff won’t mean a thing in a hundred years as well concerning the matter in question
Then, you are talking about whatever you’ve discovered in 2011
I was basically saying about performance by Comodo (& EAM) in 2012
… and 5-6 new modification of Zeus/zlob currently in the wild.
I have to be honest - I am aware though whether those were tested
And finally, TonyChipper911 was requesting “man-in-the-browser attacks” therefore was my Q about explorer
Cheers!
[attachment deleted by admin]
!ot!
Guys, if you’re going to continue this dialogue, it’s probably best to move it elsewhere. Do you want me to split it for you?
Not OffTopic at all on your behalf ![]()
My reply to TonyChipper911 here was basically about Comodo & others performance concerning particular test, which he probably missed
But sure, if you want to split “explorer” ??? & the following discussion(s) - please do
Cheers!