I’d like to announce the first beta of Comodo’s new SafeSurf Toolbar Beta. The toolbar is only the first incarnation of what is going to be a very powerful and feature rich security enhancement to anyone’s browser.
The current bar has the following features:
Fast and easy searching with the search facility.
Constant browser protection powered by Comodo’s Memory Firewall.
Quick links to our online AV scanner to check your PC is free from threats.
Helpful search highlight system to show quickly and easily where in the page your search term is.
Quick and easy access to your favourite Comodo Homepage
Quick and easy access to the Comodo Forums for help and advice.
Internet Explorer support, FireFox to follow shortly.
Windows XP/Vista support.
And many more security enhancements and new features to follow in the very near future…
This is a great news.
But I have a question about the tool bars: SafeSurf 1.0.0.6 passed all the security checks of BO tester, so why do you say that the protection of 1.0.0.6 is not matched to CMF?
I hope the next version will support Firefox.
Comodo Safesurf toobar is only an alternate name for Comodo Search toolbar.
Comodo Safesurf is a bundle of Comodo Safesurf tecnology + Comodo search toolbar.
Comodo Search toolbar can be used to access Comodo Safesurf Configuration (hence the name Comodo Safesurf Toolbar)
Comodo Safesurf Configuration can also be accessed from the tray area.
Yes, I did this test and it’s said I’m protected, but so many people said that it isn’t an exchange for CMF and if CMF not causing me problems, it’s better to use it. So, that’s way I asked if CSS gives the same protection as CMF.
There may be differences so my reply cannot replace one written by a Comodo Developer.
CMF provide many more options but the BO tests prove that Safesurf protection can be compared to CMF.
In my experience Safesurf posed less issues to me although this may be only a coincidence caused by my setup changes.
Anyway Safesurf was released after CMF so I guess its engine could have been updated.