Commandeering people around, which is your way of writing, may be considered common courtesy in the army but not as much in civil society.
Dch48 decided to to attack ME for speaking my mind politely and concisely directed to someone else. Also I wasn’t the one who said or brought into the conversation anything about anyone being evil.You’re talking about being attacked. I am not defending what Dch48 because jumping to the Google evil argument is not a valid one, but your direct military like approach can be considered attacking in the civilians world.There is a reason that military like communication is confined to that shielded part of our societies. There is an analogy to the world of business where competitive behaviour is allowed in that sphere that we most of the time don’t like in the social and personal sphereSecond, I was simply responding to what I perceived was another effort by someone who felt they could talk down to someone with less post count and be condescending about something that wasn't their place beyond giving their opinion, in which case should not have been directed as an attack on me. If they had a valid point, they should have simply stated it and argued for it logically.I think you stand your ground.Third, Even then I didn’t attack the person, I simply stated my position against what they said. Offered them a draw to drop it at the end since I have better things to do than to engage in petty banter with someone I don’t know and couldn’t care less about.
This is a technical forum and I shouldn’t have to teach anyone social etiquette/Which indeed you shouldn’t.
But after 20 years in the Corp as a Major, I won't be strong armed into silence by anyone either, especially one post pumping by hijacking comments to someone else who made it.Please stop competing.So in summary, my intent was not to come here to confront anyone, or to engage in any type of posts like this so you and I both would be grateful for the civility. I appreciate your input and agree with you completely but its a two way road, I can’t be the only one. :-TU
BTW, Dch48 made the mountain but Google is STILL evil >:-D
You aren’t Google either. Your stab under water was not needed.
Probably, and yeah we can probably accept it was a small mistake but what is insignificant to you may not be to others and frankly on a matter of principle, a failure is a failure is a failure when it doesn't match the mission, no matter how you slice it The fact that a small one happened means another can happen and how long before its a BIG one?The bug was fixed and until further notice I assume Comodo learns from it like I trust the army to be professional enough to learn from its mistakes it makes during training and operation.
Seems to you, nothing is a big one since you operate on the default that since any failure is covered by Google as a failsafe, we are all dandy. Which begs the question that if Google is so perfect and therefore the Chrome they make is perfect, why do we need Dragon to make improvements on it?Now you're twisting Dch48's words.
BTW, I promised [at]kail at least for myself that I won't engage in this kind of waste, so consider this my last reply out of courtesy and principle, if you wish to continue it, make sure its actually related to something technologically useful to the function of the software as that's the only reason I am here investing my time, not to have petty discussions.Your commandeering and competing attitude surely created waves but I'm afraid that your concern is getting lost in the process
There are tools to deal with that like Privdog, Ghostery and others.