Its all about protecting the end user both from malware and misinformation. What AV-Comparatives.org is doing is spreading misinformation and disguising the fact that they get paid by Antivirus vendors. So public who reads their reports read it with the misunderstanding that these tests are independent (which we all now know that they are NOT!).
Its a shameful practice for $$!!! People who are employed by AV-Comparatives gets good salaries. They create a good living for themselves and hide behind “non for profit” marketing gimmick. Non for profit doesn’t mean that you don’t pay very good salaries…and they do! Its a shameful shameful way of making money by feeding misinformation to unsuspecting public! They don’t deserve public’s trust!
Yes, if a result is good, its a good result. But if it was not-independent, it wouldnt be a “result”, but a fake. No matter what the name of the product was.
You forgot the words, take “equally money from each participating” antivirus vendor. And that they are “not open about it in places where YOU want that to be printed”.
If i calculate your 3 proves, the result is not “NON-independent” as a proved fact.
I dont trust people who i dont know.
Thanks for the insult
I use to put salt with any post and result i read. For the taste
But Melih, why you can trust the results here in this case? Where you know that they are honest and reflect the real world? You have no proof for it! You have no proof that this results are real and the truth! Its only a question of trust again! I can make nearly the same video, but i will fake it! I will make Comodo only 10% detection and the others i will do 90%! But u will not see that i have fake, cause i do cut it so that it looks totally real! So what you would say then?
Why you want no proof here? Here it is so easily to trust for you.
I trust this Video and the producer too … but i still ask me why in this case you dont need proofs but with AVC you need a proof!
the best way would be to look at many reviews(lets say 5-10) and make then your opinion about it. if it performances well in most of them and the results are similar than I doubt that those tests were faked and therefore trustworthy.
That’s enough M.Richter, I’ll take a extremely dim view of any further cross-topic pollution in this topic or any other… no matter how tenuous or clever you think it might be. There will be no further warnings. >:(
PS Be advise, I posted this as a Moderator. So, if you wish to discuss it with me then please PM me, do not post (reply) in this topic. If you wish to talk/complain to another Moderator (again by PM) about this post then you’re welcome to do so.