Why was COMODO not able to detect all the malware.
Malwarebytes and Hitman found a lot of malware which could pass COMODO.
Why was this possible???
Greetings
Karniaris
Watched all the 4 videos, good review. Both products were good. Norton little better for average users.
CIS 5 is an excellent product & can be used by average users. Little improvements & additions needs to be done to make it more user friendly & suitable for average users. Dont know what are the forthcoming additions & improvements, but I would really like to mention here that threatcast was a really promising feature to help in making CIS suitable for average users. So I hope threatcast will be back exploited, improved & new features, etc.
Thanxx
Naren
Some other review of Comodo.
White Russian, when looking at resource use you have to look at cmdagent.exe and cfp.exe.
cmdagent.exe is the main module, cfp.exe is just the GUI.
Matt
p.s. I don`t think CIS works correctly in VirtualBox.
I dont understand what you mean. My last comment was that I dont belive anyone using CIS would run into such a extreme storm of malware that the sandbox will be full as in an antimalware review.
‘On the same level?’ Yeah right! Comodo is better, bet more people get infected using bloated Norton as opposed to people who use Comodo which protects more whilst at same time offering for no cost. :ilovecomodo: :ilovecomodo: :ilovecomodo:
so Norton has 100% detection and can catch every malware using detection?
Melih
Just an idea: when i have tested, a lot of malware running in sandbox eat a lot of resources and slowdown the PC (like in video)
May be it can be a idea to make an option button in setting that can be:
“auto kill resource eater program running in the sandbox”.
Would be better some kind of popup alert like Norton has:
[quote]Performance Monitoring
Performance Monitoring is new for Norton 2011. It provides informative alerting based on application performance. If an application is using too much CPU, Memory, writing too much to Disk, or using too many Handles, We
Performance Monitoring in next CIS :-TU
[attachment deleted by admin]
I don’t really think performance processing is needed. What is needed is the ability for cis to automatically terminate processes that got spawned by files that were run in the sandbox. By that I mean this:
Lets say you run a application, call it App-A, it gets run in sandbox automatically.
Then it spawns another process lets day CMD call it App-B.
Now a few things can happen, a user can terminate the original process (App-), it can be terminated by a Buffer Flow Attack dialog, Cloud Av, Cloud Behavior Blocker or D+.
What happens now is that App-A is closed but App-B is left running, what you want to happen is that once CIS realizes App-A has been closed it should automatically terminate App-B, because the parent process is not gone.
This will solve the issue with leftover things running in memory without having to restart. Or another thing that could happen is that CIS gives you a pop up saying “Original application is closed but the applications it opened are running in memory, please restart to clear out the left over processes.”
+1 I don’t want CIS to add all kinds of stuff outside the realm of malware protection.
May be when malware process is terminated, all of its spawned process should be terminated automatically.
we have the luxury of Free!
We don’t have to put all sorts of unnecessary and unrelated stuff to try to justify all that money user has paid! Other fee paid providers are forced to do that.
Melih
Thanks. Personally, I would rather CIS stay as lean as possible, rather than see it add spam protection, parental controls, backup, and other bloat. If I want to add that stuff, there are add-ons available.
+1
vote for my idea https://forums.comodo.com/wishlist-cis/left-over-process-change-needed-w-poll-t62028.0.html;viewResults=
Norton was better in this video 
+1 :-TU