CIS Certifications, Test Results & Reviews

siketa · January 22, 2015, 1:42pm

New AV-Test

cohbraz · January 22, 2015, 2:04pm

How does Comodo score better in 0-day attacks than “widespread and prevalent” malware from the past 4 weeks?

Netguy101 · January 22, 2015, 2:21pm

Looks like CIS didn’t do so well on protection this time around…

Cassette · January 22, 2015, 3:16pm

One is a detection score. The other is a protection score. Comodo has solid protection, as always. Its detection, although adequate, should be a little better.

cohbraz · January 22, 2015, 4:29pm

Ah. I see what you are saying. Thanks.

WinBMY · January 23, 2015, 8:27am

From the AV-Test report, My understanding is:
1.
Comodo CIS Protection test rate to the 0-days malware attacks is 100% in 2014 Nov, and Dec.
Above average. The industry average protection rate 94%

It means Comodo CIS provide a very good protection.

But Comodo CIS detection rate was 98% in 2014 Nov, and 97% in Dec, 2014.
Some what near the industry average, but below. Industry average is 99%

Performance is good, and

4 Comodo CIS has some space need to improve in Usability, such as false warning and false blockages.

Melih · January 23, 2015, 2:01pm

Why should we have to detect the malware if we already protect you from it using some other mechanism?

Xeno · January 23, 2015, 3:02pm

Because using method described here & here malware can bypass all layers of Comodo protection.

yro · January 23, 2015, 4:58pm

I didnt see that reports and now Im thinking seriously on leaving CIS.

If a simple “exe” file, without any codes on it, can run with privilegies from a trusted file on the computer so if a lammer/cracker would he can make an malware/typo of only to affect CIS users? This is crazy!

Correct me if Im wrong Melih.

EDIT.: Another question is: Is CIS leaving the data-base av and going on the sandbox road only? If so we will be presented with serious problems from now on. Imagine this picture: a user turn on his computer. CIS takes sometime to executate and the user dont see that CIS is not running yet (this happens all the time in CIS 8). the user goes online and, by mistake, click on some ■■■■ link or download some bad stuff from an e-mail or an scan site, etc. Voila! his pc goes to limbo… only because CIS didnot protect him by av signatures and the sandbox is trickie.

Using the comodo sandbox is a nice feature but it can be dangerous because the messages it shows are not so intuitive.

siketa · January 31, 2015, 6:04pm

LanGuy is back!!!

sd_ahmad · February 25, 2015, 6:03pm

Comodo is not among the best list,But why “CEM” is not on the list of tests
http://www.av-test.org/en/award/2014/

Mops21 · March 2, 2015, 1:14pm

Hi

Comodo Internet Security 8 Final Test and Review

lugo_58 · March 2, 2015, 1:24pm

CIS Proactive Configuration (without HIPS)

Video : https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ieadx_cis-proactive-config-review_tech

Good job CIS :-TU

sd_ahmad · March 7, 2015, 10:38am

Comodo SecureBox Test and Review

HaryHr · March 7, 2015, 5:13pm

Comodo Internet Security 8.2 BETA test by languy99

Tcheltenham · March 7, 2015, 5:24pm

Comodo sandbox is not as secure as people may think here is the proof:(a) - YouTube
(b) - YouTube

I made the link clickable. Eric

yro · March 11, 2015, 8:05pm

what are the final thougts on cis 8.2 beta? I cant see the video at work…

Citizen_K · March 11, 2015, 11:45pm

I split your question and the subsequent discussion from this topic. Please continue in [Off topic splits]CIS Certifications, Test Results & Reviews.

GOA · March 25, 2015, 12:54pm

AV-TEST Product Review and Certification Report – Jan-Feb/2015

http://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/windows-8/february-2015/comodo-internet-security-premium-8.0--8.1-150690/

nikos200 · April 15, 2015, 11:21am

Comodo Internet Security Test