Unfortunately, whitelisting won’t really solve the False Positive problem, because it’s essentially infinite – there will always be a stream of new things that can only be whitelisted after the fact. Case in point is the Internet Explorer cache problem I documented today, for which the only apparent work-around is a global exclusion rule. The only real solution is smarter anti-virus.
Nah if he said good I would of agreed but he said the best ha ha ha ha…Clock is ticking! I would not enter the AV into any AV grading site as it would get ripped to shreds because of it’s FP’s issues.
One of the best… Was his words if I remember correctly. =) not “The best”. Or something like “one of the best if not the best”, don’t have the time to search it. =) but it was not “the best” he said…
patrice58, you avoided the question… I think I know why… And stop flaming the community of comodo, its really childish, and its nothing wrong with someone who likes Comodo or CIS or any of comodos products.
Thanks, but as I said earlier in this thread, that solves only part of the problem while reducing protection. I’ve thought this through carefully, and I’m quite serious about the Subject.
Well, technically speaking you lose just the same protection as going back to an older version.
If it’s still flagging files even when set to OFF, then Comodo seriously needs a better QA…