My unsoliticed opinion on this subject:
When Windows XP was released, they had a new interface, but they kept the old interface as an option and called it Classic.
This is what Comodo should have done.
CIS should have been modularised, so that the security engines are separate entitities from the interace.
For example, in financial firms, they use Cobol to do the calculations on a mainframe, the data is fed to some kind of web server running Windows or Unix, and there is some form of interprocess communication between the two systems.
Similary, in Linux, there are distributions with different windowing environments.
The core linux is the same, but there are many different interfaces to choose from.
IMO the only solution is for Comodo to add the v5 interface to v6, like adding Classic to Windows 7 if someone at Microsoft was dumb enough to leave it out when 7 was released.
If CIS is designed in a modular fashion, this should not be too difficult.
I do not have use for any of the new “features” in v6; just like some people use Windows Classic interface with Windows 7, I prefer v5 interface, it justs works, I am secure.
This is like me having 5-lock system on my door for years, NEVER had a break-in, and some guy tells me he can give me a ten-lock system for FREE! that is ten times more powerful, but I have to spend my time learning new way to use these new locks.
What is ten times an A, is it not the same A on the report card?
Maybe free in cost, but what about my time, time needed to learn something new I don’t need?
XP was v5 of Windows; I skipped the terrible v6 of Windows, AKA Vista but upgraded to Windows 7.
CIS v6 is an abomination, just like Vista; I will have to stick with v5 until v7 appears, even though Melih has clearly stated previously in this thread that v5 has a lot of bugs, even though it is no longer supported.