Every product will be integrated, but it doesn’t happen in one day. We’re intensively working on extending Valkyrie capabilities.
Yes, please don’t feel in a rush :-TU I have more trust on these projects (Valkyrie and Viruscope) so make them more stable then implement.
Thank you guys for your all efforts
Good news :-TU
Just to mention, it would be good if CIS/CCAV checks the hash of the executed unknown file in Valkyrie before submission.
CCAV checks but CIS not. On the roadmap.
Hi.
Is CCAV going to have file rating scan on its first final release?
EDIT.: Oh. sorry. Wrong topic.
Since manual analysis was removed to users with no subscription, this is getting more and more confusing. So… I have more questions obviously.
Please consider the following scenario :
- User submits a file to Valkyrie and it is detected as malware (signature-based detection)
- We know that Valkyrie does machine learning
- After 1 month, it turns out that that another user submits it as false-positive
- Analysts agree that it’s a false-positive
- But Valkyrie did machine learning?? What happens, now? Does the analyst feed Valkyrie (automatically, of course) with the same file, again?
And now,
- User submits a clean file
- Valkyrie detects it as malicious (machine learning)
- The user is unable to submit it for manual analysis due to no subscription and we all know machine learning is effective with large data
- How does Valkyrie handle it?
Its really nice. Is it going to be integrated on cis 9? Is it going to be integrated in ccav too? atleast in a better way?
please, see the wish reports on ccav sub-forum about problems and features we need badly on ccav.
another question: you are talking about valkyrie on cis sub-forums. is it going to be used as database “base” for cis future versions or not? Please, talk a little bit more about it. We, users, are crazy to know about it…
With Valkyrie getting integrated CIS is one step closer to the promise of a 15 minutes look up time for unknown files as described in Unknown Files - The Scanning Processes
In either case, the result is reported back to your CIS installation in approximately 15 minutes.
Add to that the promise that 2016 will show development of recognisers for Viruscope and CIS and CCAV will grow providing even stronger protection.
please, see the wish reports on ccav sub-forum about problems and features we need badly on ccav.What do you mean with database “base”?another question: you are talking about valkyrie on cis sub-forums. is it going to be used as database “base” for cis future versions or not? Please, talk a little bit more about it. We, users, are crazy to know about it…
That’s a great feature of Valkyrie, you’re right. We have plans to integrate with CIS 9, and it is currently being integrated with CCAV. I think the next CCAV release will include full integration with Valkyrie (maybe they can also add this Lucky You stats)
sorry, maybe a typo. “basis”.
So as far as I understand, Valkyrie is still not integrated in the current version of CCAV, right? I ask you this because I see no detection in real time by Valkyrie so far.
ok, silence is acquiescence, so I presume it is not integrated 88)
usually, but not always 
Current CCAV is integrated with Valkyrie. It uploads the file and doesn’t wait the response if Valkyrie doesn’t have a verdict and needs to analyze it (it takes about 1-2 minutes to analyze for some cases). The next run of the same file, CCAV gets the response.
Does CCAV always upload a file or does it first calculate and send a hash to Valkyrie servers?
First calculates hash, then uploads if Valkyrie doesn’t have that file.
We have also camas.comodo.com… sometimes I upload files to camas.comodo.com
Why don’t Valkyrie analyze those files in FLS? otherwise, these two services uses different file lookup systems?
We already have 2 years old unknown files in FLS…Can Valkyrie start from begining to analyze them?
We’re combining all of them now. we’ll be able to handle all very soon.
Good news, thanks :-TU
where can i get this goddess?