Yes, I agree KIS does not make right decisions 100% of time,
Now, please understand that at least KIS knows about computer security lot more than what an average/novice user does.
If a novice user is left to take decisions in the same case, he would not take right decisions even 50% of time.
This is what all I was talking about…
If, as EricJH said, we stop all the alerts and keep it to Deny All, say Paranoid, then you may say that we are protected by CIS more than KIS, but this comes at the cost of losing so many legitimate/genuine programs (being stopped by CIS).
AutoSandbox is a great initiative towards simplifying this and filling the gap. Still, I am waiting for it to mature before I suggest anybody to keep it enabled. (It also brings tons of problems along with it.
Many programs become either half functioning, or malfunctioning , and most users do not notice that the odd behaviour is because the program is running in Sandbox. They simply complain that their systems is corrupt and not functioning properly…(As I always mention, I am talking on behalf of Novice users, who do not understand what sandbox is and how it works…)
So, presently it is only further complicating the situations, that is why I do not encourage most of my friends to enable sandbox at all, especially those who can not follow on screen instructions.
You know, most people here who use photoshop, they just know how to use photoshop, they do not know single bit extra. If photoshop does not work, or system gives some other error message for any reason, they simply complain that the system is corrupted.
I know, they have to learn a lot and mature, but my experience in life always instructs me, if I want to change 100 people, I am not supposed to ask/command all those 100 people to come to me, instead I go to them, meet them right where they are. If I can reach them first, impress them and influence them, then they will surely follow me where ever I take them.