avast in fact also wants to hurt gdata and comodo,avast treats these two like ■■■■ btw im not happy of with avast is doing to these two i mean what did gdata and comodo do to avast cause them this to happen.
in fact i thank gdata for its ability to kill its firewall if one is present gdata will kill it and make that firewall as its own if a anthor is there
so far it only works with 64 bit i haven’t see gdata kill it own firewall in the 32 bit
Now now, nsm, remember that it is against AV-C policy to post the direct page to the test results so please do edit the link. :a0 And yes, I am everywhere. Hello.
Because he removed the pdf link before you posted (or had a look)… I mean, did you think about that? No, no, no, I am not flame baiting and had no intention of provoking nsm like you have assumed.
Sure, I’ll answer your question. I made an account last year to post my feedback on Comodo (at the time, I had recently trialed it) and to answer some questions about Panda Cloud. Turned out pbust had made an account here so that was cool. Well, that pretty much sums it up.
i don’t think so after all your avast! team member admitted that avast wants to hunt gdata so can explain why your avast! teammate said that and if you want to see the email i be more then happy to show it to you
My dear fellow, I’m not sure you need to be so concerned about the effect of Mr Kurtin’s formerly covert agenda, when IMO your video reviews of GData 2013 are far more likely to “hurt GData” than any fiendishly clever plot by Avast to destroy GData by making their own scan engine and definitions as inferior as possible.