Send me a link where you downloaded it from. Here you go again. Why dont you try running only Comodo instead of having Geswall and that Shield running in the back round. Your using an Nvidia main board and there firewall is junk. Your tests arent exactly accurate when your running other security software in the back round. I am pretty sure the Shield belongs to your Nvidia mobo. Your also using RootRepeal which is beta software.
Shield is part of Eaz-Fix instant recovery. Nothing from Nividia. I can,t discard GW, it,s much more reliable. Sent u the link. Pls do post ur results here.
Ok now after I reboot I am back. That program made D+ go nuts. I had " Hi Guys" D+ alerts all over the place. Once again I do not see the problem. D+ is doing its job. It must be your set up that is effecting D+ and how it worls. Look at my logs. I had atleast 10 alerts from D+. Too many that I couldnt hit my screen shit button.
Aigle, I have to admit he’s right here. Unless you use multiple virtual machines on which there is instaled only one HIPS software then there is always a risk that it won’t behave as it is supposted to.
I did this test on a real world machine. My desktop. No virtualization on. I only run Comodo and NOD32. Have you ever stop to think for once that maybe Geswall running along side Comodo is screwing up D+. Also why dont you shut off shadow surfer. Until your running any of your tests in a real environment with only Comodo running I will consider your threads like this null envoid.
Well if you go into Wilders you will see that aigle is a member there and his sig says "Comodo Firewall,Threatfire and Gewall. If all of these are in real time then BINGO. We found his problem. He keeps making threads stating D+ sucks and is not doing its job but all these other programs are. But I have shown twice that D+ works. Screen shots do not lie.
No he doesn’t. He tested CFP, and opened a thread to see if the results are the same for others. He is perfectly aware of possible conflicts, and he asks for others to verify.
He’s been doing this for quite some time, unlike you.
Vettetech, i remember you “testing” Online Armor, saying it passed a test because OA prompted for execution. It took a while for you to sink in the notion that it wasn’t about execution…
I think i’m going to have a hard time again, explaining you a simple thing.
This is not “aigle claims CFP failed”, and “aha see you luser CFP passes, i proved you wrong”.
Look at what he said: “Can anyone confirm my findings?”. He is asking for confirmation, he’s not claiming anything.
Aigle came here to see if his results match the results from others.
In future, do not participate. You have the wrong attitude, and you make people not want to post tests.
Get you fanboy hat off. No one is attacking Comodo.
A person, in good faith, having read both threads as you did, will understand that aigle wants feedback, and confirmation.
He may have forgotten to include “Can anyone confirm my findings?” in Wilders, but that is mostly tied to the fact that in Wilders it’s obvious, and long time Wilders members will verify results if possible, have a friendly discussion, purely based on technical issues.