No mention of Comodo

[rambo]

No mention of Comodo.
I wonder why ???

http://www.tallemu.com/online-armor-matousec-security-rating.html

[system]

@rambo post:1

No mention of Comodo.
I wonder why ???

http://www.tallemu.com/online-armor-matousec-security-rating.html

Hmmmm…

I wonder? 88)

Josh

[panic]

Tallemu have their business and Comodo have theirs. All this “he said - she said” from both sides is getting a little wearing and usually only servers to reinforce the “fanboy” image that both sides are developing a reputation for.

We should all chill, take a pill and have a big lie down.

Ewen

[goodbrazer]

I guess because of this:

As before , Matousec also included major brandname firewalls [b]which Online Armor surpassed[/b], including:

OA didn’t surpass CFP that’s why CFP is not in the list.

[panic]

LOL. Good point Yuriy. I was just trying to prevent things getting out of hand.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Ewen

[system]

@panic post:3

Tallemu have their business and Comodo have theirs. All this “he said - she said” from both sides is getting a little wearing and usually only servers to reinforce the “fanboy” image that both sides are developing a reputation for.

We should all chill, take a pill and have a big lie down.

Ewen

Yeah I agree.

I think I’ll start locking posts with arguments on these silly debates.

Josh

[goodbrazer]

No problems Ewen (V)