No access to the internet

Hello,

now I Installed the firewall on my laptop, too
But I have no access to the internet with two programmes (IE6 & AVG Antivirus updater).
At my PC the connection is fine with both.
The application an network setting are the same. Other application e.g. ping, tracert are fine.
If I deinstall the comodo firewall, the connection of IE6 & AVG Antivirus updater are fine, too.
If I Install the comodo firewall again, I have the same problems although I give them full access by all questions.
Did anyone have some idea?

Okay, so do you have version 2.4 of the firewall installed now, on both machines?

The Activity Logs will show why those applications are being blocked. Go to the Logs, right-click on an entry, select “Export to HTML” and save the file. Reopen the file, and copy/paste as text into your post.

We’ll look at it and see what is being blocked.

LM

Here are my log, but i don´t see anything about the IE or the AVG!
In the Network-Rules I have only the Standard-Rules and additional 2 Rules to allow all for my LAN.

Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:46:13

Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, Protocol = IGMP)
Protocol:IGMP Incoming
Source: MY-Router-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.1
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:44:08
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, Protocol = IGMP)
Protocol:IGMP Incoming
Source: MY-Router-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.1
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:43:58
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Outbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, Protocol = IGMP)
Protocol:IGMP Outgoing
Source: Laptop-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.22
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:41
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbname(137))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbname(137)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbname(137)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:36
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbname(137))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbname(137)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbname(137)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:36
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbdgram(138))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:31
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbname(137))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbname(137)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbname(137)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:31
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbdgram(138))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:26
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbname(137))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbname(137)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbname(137)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:26
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbdgram(138))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:40:00
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, Protocol = IGMP)
Protocol:IGMP Incoming
Source: MY-Router-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.1
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:39:40
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbname(137))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbname(137)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbname(137)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:39:35
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbname(137))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbname(137)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbname(137)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:37:55
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, Protocol = IGMP)
Protocol:IGMP Incoming
Source: MY-Router-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.1
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:35:55
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, IP = PC1-LAN, Port = nbdgram(138))
Protocol: UDP Incoming
Source: PC1-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Destination: Bcats-LAN:nbdgram(138)
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:35:50
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Inbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, Protocol = IGMP)
Protocol:IGMP Incoming
Source: MY-Router-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.1
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5
Date/Time :2007-02-02 20:35:25
Severity :Medium
Reporter :Network Monitor
Description: Outbound Policy Violation (Access Denied, Protocol = IGMP)
Protocol:IGMP Outgoing
Source: Laptop-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.22
Reason: Network Control Rule ID = 5

In the Log of my PC1 I have Application Access denied! (I understand why this is so)
But at my Laptop I don´t understand whats going on, see my description above.

I´ve wrote it above. I´ve only Standard Rules look at the screenshot.

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/5390/comodonetworkcontrolrulpg7.th.jpg

And I have no alert for blocking an application!

On more INFO.
If I set the “adjust security level” to “allow all” both application didn´t funktion, too!
I had expect, that any traffic allowed now ???

Rule ID 7 is probably unnecessary; it’s covered by Rule ID 1 (this is because TCP/UDP is a type of IP protocol); however, it won’t hurt anything to leave it as it is, either. :wink: And sometimes it seems to work a little better to have a separate, defined rule like that, too.

I don’t see anything in the rules that would cause a problem; your bottom Block All rule is set to Log, and the only violations are IGMP; which should also be covered by your Rules ID 0 & 1. However, it may help to create a separate set of rules allowing IGMP traffic in the following way:

Action: Allow
Protocol: IP
Source: Laptop-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.22
IP Details: IGMP

Action: Allow
Protocol:IGMP Incoming
Source: MY-Router-IP
Destination: 224.0.0.1
IP Details: IGMP

Some routers require IGMP traffic; if yours needs it, this could very well be the problem.

If that doesn’t do it for you, would you post a screenshot of your Application Monitor rules, like you did for the Network Monitor?

TNX,

LM

OK, you´re right. If I restart the IE or the AVG they funktion bei the Setting “Allowed all”
One Problem less (:WAV)
Next time I post the Application Rules. But there are “Allow all” by any Application.

Here ist the Screenshot of the Application Rules

http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9018/comodoapplicationcontroxq8.th.jpg

But I don´t think that I made any failure becaus there are allowed anything.

An

And I dont´t think so, because the same Rules are on my PC, and their they funktion correct :cry:
But I will tray it.

I´ve tried the the Rules but they don´t work.
But now I have found the problem! :BNC
I had installed another Firewall, but deinstalled it before I installed Comodo.
In this Firewall there was no deinstall routine so I had to delete it in the registry. The problem was that I did not find each entry. (:SAD)
Now I installed an older image and tried it again - and it seems to function correctly.

Well there you go; glad you found the problem, chakachan! Remains of old firewalls and other security software can certainly cause problems!

In that case, if all is good, you can remove those useless rules I had you create. After all, if you don’t need them, why have them?

LM