Melih, we need a web filter for malicious scripts

[Citizen_K]

@Henrique - RJ post:16

CIS does or not prevent malicious script without web filter too late. Web filter for objects would additional and important layer.

CIS doesn’t scan e-mail because it is in " *.eml " extension.

ooohhh God !

I stopped using email filtering once I started using Avira back in the days and that was before even before I started using CFP 3.0 alpha or CIS. It never has gotten me into troubles.

From the man himself:

@Melih post:1550

Web filters for protecting against malicious files are not neccessary if you are using CIS.
Web filters for “content” not “executable” like phishing etc is necessary.

So if you are using web filters against “executables” then you don’t need to with CIS…
If you are using it for content filtering (eg: classifying websites) or phishing (identify phishing sites/emails etc), then its good.

If you feel CIS is not protecting you enough when you browse simply run the browser in the sandbox.

@AimeeLW post:17

I would like to see Comodo develop the shellcode protection into something more like Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit and EMET, through I admit I have no idea on what kind of exploits Comodo’s shellcode protection does protect against and does not, I’m just expressing my idea and wish of that is what I would like to see from Comodo if it already does not cover these areas like Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit and EMET, I feel this could protect against malicious scripts and other things in web pages

Comodo has buffer overflow protection integrated in CIS which protects against:

• Detection of Buffer Overflows which occur in the STACK memory
• Detection of Buffer Overflows which occur in the HEAP memory
• Detection of ret2libc attacks