As you obviously are unable to address the arguments provided by several members it comes at no surprise your willingness to turn this topic in a petty quarrel.
Hopefully nobody will be baited by your attempts.
Peace.
Ok boys and girls. I think that’s enough. I’ll lock this now.
Thank you for your input wj32 it has been most informative. I’m sorry this thread has degenerated so far. Please feel free to open another thread if you would like to continue a technical discussion.
I would like to add the following consideration to this topic.
Comodo is the nanny of the programs and not the nanny of the user’s decisions. That means that Comodo will alert you if programs try to modify or start other programs. Only when a program can bypass Comodo in modifying or starting another program only then Comodo is bypassed.
Comodo was never built with the idea to protect the user from making mistakes. It seems to me that in this case the user let Process Hacker do its thing.
Protecting the user from making mistakes is what Vista’s User Account Control does and is therefor disliked if not hated by many. Windows 7 UAC takes out this aspect reducing the amount of alerts by approx 35%.
I guess that when Comodo would start protecting the user it would produce even more alerts then it already does; the latter is not always appreciated already.