Hackers breached security firm Bit9, then attacked its customers/Whitelist Comp

http://news.yahoo.com/hackers-breached-security-firm-bit9-then-attacked-customers-221832250--sector.html

wonder if any of their whitelists are used by comodo?
or did comodo issue any of their certificates that may have been breached??

https://www.bit9.com/

their slogan is The leader in Trust based Security

“Due to an operational oversight within Bit9, we failed to install our own product on a handful of computers within our network,” Chief Executive Patrick Morley wrote on Bit9’s blog. “As a result, a malicious third party was able to illegally gain temporary access to one of our digital code-signing certificates that they then used to illegitimately sign malware.”

Who issued that cert?I don’t think they are a signing authority…hmmm

"Due to an operational oversight within Bit9, we failed to install our own product on a handful of computers within our network,"
I don't know about anyone else but I burst out laughing when I read that. What a classic case of a Corporate screwup !

Comodo needs to determine the details of the stolen certificate and make sure it’s blacklisted ASAP. That’s if Bit9 is in the trusted vendors list.

Right,
They are not in the trusted vendor list in cis6.

Here’s a report from the 8th:

:a0

There may be deep irony in this attack: While Bit9 has made a name for itself based on the reality that antivirus software cannot keep up with the tens of thousands of new malware variants being unleashed on the Internet each day [the company brags that Bit9 is the only security firm to stop both the Flame malware and the RSA breach attack, even before they were identified by traditional/legacy antivirus companies], there is a better than even chance that the malware signed with Bit9′s keys was first detected with traditional antivirus products. But only time will tell how the initial discovery really played out.

There is indeed some deep irony right there that only gods could have invented… :wink: