Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit [EMET] VS Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit

Anyone tried Microsoft EMET and Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit?
Do they function the same (i.e. protect softwares from being exploit due to vulnerabilities)?
Which one do a better job?
Thank you!

EMET download: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=39273
Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit download: http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=128145

InsanityBit: ExploitShield – Smart AntiExecutable

I like Malwarebytes, and I find it to be the best antivirus. They’re a legit company, and maybe they’ll turn ExploitShield into something legitimate as well. But until then I don’t see its use, it just seems like extra attack surface.

If you want a real anti-exploit program, use EMET. It actually prevents exploits, or mitigations stage 1/2 payloads (as opposed to stage 3, which is the final executable) and prevents an attacker from ever getting shell access.

Thanks JoWa. That helps :slight_smile: