Sorry to raise this again but are BOClean and Comodo Memory Guardian incorporated into CFP3 v.295 yet.
At the moment I am using CFP3 v295 with Defense+ and BOClean and all works well.
Do I need Memory guardian as well?
Thanks,
Mike.
Sorry to raise this again but are BOClean and Comodo Memory Guardian incorporated into CFP3 v.295 yet.
At the moment I am using CFP3 v295 with Defense+ and BOClean and all works well.
Do I need Memory guardian as well?
Thanks,
Mike.
(:WAV)
BOClean and Memory Firewall are not integrated at the moment. (:WIN) Maybe later :SMLR
Thanks Commodus.
Personally i don’t see any reason to use BOClean when you run CFP v3. I guess HIPS component (Defense+) protects from all possible threats, except Buffer Overflow exploits (that’s why we need Comodo Memory Firewall ;)).
Interesting; anyone else’s views on the subject?
Mike.
Here can be found slipfest - great test for CMF (should be running from stack to CMF display prompts)
I agree with goodbrazer. I also run only CFP 3 and CMF (:KWL) But I also want to have CAVS 3 as a backup (kind of an insurance if something slips trouhgt) (:WIN)
We started a thread (don’t have it handy i am afraid sorry ) where we asked the question as to if you have v3 + CMF (memory guardian/firewall) why do you need AV. The main reason is: if you want to execute unknown applications. So if you only want to run apps that are whitelisted and confident about apps you run then CPF+CMF is good enough. if you like to take risk and execute apps you don’t have confidence in, then AV is a good backup.
thanks
Melih
Thanks Melih, I’ll keep all three then, CFP, CMF and Boclean.
No problems with any of them at the moment.
Thanks for the excellent programs.
Mike.
Strange thing I have noticed, CFPv3 brings up an alert for cmf update; doesn’t seem to be on it’s white list. Has it been overlooked or is there a security reason?
Mike.