(:SAD)
I read this post today at the Kaspersky Lab Forum. Is that true? I don’t believe because I rely on CFP. Who knows about it? "Comodo did not do anything to stop the Trojan acting as a server. This is supposed to be a simple task for a good firewall: stop a Trojan from acting as a server." Best Regards.
???
Quotation:
"Hythloday
post Yesterday, 12:59
Post #7
Member
**
Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 19.06.2007
Member No.: 48064
QUOTE(Lykoris @ 5.07.2007 10:31)
but lately noted in a PC mag that Comodo scored higher on leak tests (considering it is free I wasn’t so impressed with ZA (although they did score high alongside Kaspersky)) and also read somewhere that ZA depends upon Kaspersky for their daily AV updates (I don’t know how true this is…).
of effectiveness and configurability?
You should not believe everything you read:-)
Here is an older firewall test:
http://www.firewallleaktester.com/tests.php
I am quite aware that there are new versions of many programs. Comodo may be very good in leaktests but there is more to a firewall than that. A month ago I had Comodo installed on my computer when I got the Drive Clean 2006 Smitfraud on my screen. In my system log I found the following warning (in Dutch):
De server {C7E3D60-7A9F-428F-ABB1-O3DCOFA4F493} heeft zich binnen de vereiste termijn niet bij DCOM geregistreerd.
In other words Comodo did not do anything to stop the Trojan acting as a server. This is supposed to be a simple task for a good firewall: stop a Trojan from acting as a server."
:THNK