Yes and I am in no way against the idea, I can see it could be beneficial to some users that do not require Dragon due to the smaller download if it was removed. :-TU
But your opinion:
1.Why not included IceDragon?
2.Just why not include in IceDragon?
Not all users are using the OS 64 bit. Then, if approached correctly, do not need to hide (members package CIS) the rest, for additional options.
Thanks.
I voted against removing the browser. I see no problem there.
That does not answer why?
This is the answer - I do not care. ;)
I agree it would be great to see IceDragon offered, but other than that it’s not an issue to me.
Bundling is a fact of life now, I see it as the ‘price’ we pay for having such great freeware everywhere and, it’s not difficult to find the CIS installer that just has CIS and nothing else.
I agree it would be great to see IceDragon offered, but other than that it's not an issue to me.
Thank you for your opinion.
....... it's not difficult to find the CIS installer that just has CIS and nothing else.
That's interesting.
Where you will find only the AV and FW?
Only in older versions.
---------------------------------------
Include a load that is [u]not necessary.[/u]?
Thanks.
It was the best option initially.
But it went the other way because …
This should have been done since the CIS 6 version.
Need to change the approach to the users.
If do not want to be removed from the installation, him need to offer at the very beginning and openly. But personally, I do not need it is volume of the package.
You can download the AV and FW as an installer with no bundles from Comodo but they don’t make it easy to find…
The easiest way I find is to get the link from MajorGeeks (just google “Comodo CIS MajorGeeks”) and that will give you the installer with no extras. Also separate x86 and x64 installers.
What these links give you is the latest version of CIS (not an older version that then updates itself). x86 is 45.2 mb, x64 is 52.62 mb. What you get is just the AV and FW, nothing else.