Thank you very much EricCrypti for your detailed and much appreciated reply. Personally, I am also interested in the problem of nanto01.
We’re reading everywhere that many infections also come from attachments included in e-mails (for example).
Sorry if I’m being too picky… But it’s technical curiosity that gets the better of me…
Does this mean that these also escape analysis?
I need to understand how Comodo CIS works to avoid getting infected.
Does this mean that files that arrive in the “Downloads” folder are not analyzed in memory before being written to? I was convinced that before being written to disk, they pass through memory?
Is this reasoning different for different Windows (7,(the 8th we don’t count )10,11) or for different Windows settings? (Windows memory access protection, for example, or Virtualization).
Perhaps direct transfer (without passing through memory) only takes place for NVME disks or depending on certain interfaces and their drivers?
Would we be less protected when writing directly from CPU—>NVME than from CPU—>RAM—>HDD?
I’d be really curious to know how this happens in the machine…
Please don’t reply, like some other moderators, “Whatever happens, you’re protected with Comodo CIS”…
We get that…, it’s the process that interests me…
Is it any different with the beta?
If I could, I’d immediately add the Downloads folder to the quick scan…
(can we have this option for version 2024?)