Your missing the fact that the code for 16.0.912.63 was already out when dragon 16.1.1.0 released… Google just had not put it out to public yet. Probably going through Google QA before release… 
Dragon 16.1
344
AND 9 BONUS POINTS
out of a total of 450 points
chrome stable has caught up with the core dragon is using
344
AND 13 BONUS POINTS
out of a total of 450
ok, I got the favicons going after the post
and I’m waiting for flash plug to DL
thx for the help
kw
Mod edit: Fixed quote tags, Captainsticks.
the most idiotic conclusion i hear for long time around this place.
■■■■ man , i dont give a fXXX on google chrome , in matter of fact i hate them ( regarding the Chromium source code security fixes).
i already declared , i switch to use dragon OVER google chrome some time back …so next time check your self before sound pathetic ;D
OmeletGuy
i think now i understand how its going , 10x alot for lighting my way
It’s not that, it’s that you come asking about something that is not implemented into Dragon and it seems like they are behind, other than challenging OmeletGuy’s explanation(hush-hush, just go along with it). Just wait for them to be fixed, don’t bring that FUD around, users can get paranoid and begin to switch here and there because of that. Some security updates don’t affect many users (I can be wrong on many levels on this one) but some can be critical. Either way, some whine that they want the latest A.S.A.P. or they don’t feel secure and would rather see Dragon, or any other browser under an older (mini-versions to full Stable versions), as behind. This is regardless of your intentions (Just to discuss or rubbing it in).
I am anticipated of the new release of Dragon, so I just wait for Dragon’s new version, regardless if Chrome is 1 - 200 times ahead, I am not exaggerating. They’ll work on the browser, so it’s nothing to forget.
I don’t even know why people are discussing Chrome in this thread. Chrome is what we want to avoid. All Comodo is doing with Dragon is making sure its synced with the most stable version of CHROMIUM possible, usually the one that becomes Chrome, and add their own security features.
Stop fighting about Chrome.
Glad to hear the favicons are working and all the best with the Flash plug-in.
Same sentiments. I find it rather an insult, that’s why I went berserk.
If they release new stuff, don’t point it out in public, it causes people to get paranoid (Not necessarily have to restate this again). Simply address the situation to the admin in private. Don’t forget that they won’t sit lightly and will address/imply the new updates eventually.
:-TU :-TU :-TU
So you hate Google but still use the Google’s code to develop Dragon? :o You can develop you own code then. ;D 
Who was this aimed at?
I hate Google just for the fact that I get told to “Google this” and “Google that.” Seriously, grow up guys, I use Yahoo!, it’s irrelevant to tell me to search under the name of another.
Privacy things I cared less. (I hate Google for something not important, when privacy is more important)
Once Dragon is developed, it becomes something new, unless something is still directing to Google.
That’s actually a very good point!
Google Chrome has Omnibox suggestions, sync, multi-profile Google logins, and auto-update checks that are all directed to Google. Have all of these been turned off in CD?
I had a chance to think about this recently. CD has Omnibox/address bar suggestion/prediction right? Are address bar keystrokes being sent to Google and are the suggestions coming from Google?
This is exactly what I was going to mention. ;D
But anyways, I do NOT mean to stir up a heated fight between CD and Google. So this is my last input in this topic:
-
If you hate Google and “Chrome is what we want to avoid.”, then do not use their code and develop YOUR own. Obviously without the Chromium code from Google CD would not be made possible.
-
I think it is NOT the CEO’s intention to hate Google. His sole intention is to develop a good browser for all to share and “spread the love”.
-
From my viewpoint Comodo and Google (and all other major companies) should all work together in harmony so that they can reach their own goals. Otherwise, just as the CEO said sometime ago – we would only be helping cybercriminals.
This is my 2 cents.
They are working with Google on some occasions. If you have Ghostery, you can see Google Analytics is ranking on this site.
Being anti-Google, I don’t support your idea and they can get code from other sources. But yes, it’s still derived from Google’s Chromium, so it’s still partially Google somewhat. It’s better this than Chrome, though, to my POV. Comodo is a security company, don’t assume that they need to work with Google on the occasion of “cybercriminals,” more like they should be asking advice from Comodo’s security team on that behalf. The “other major” companies comment I support.
Working in Harmony with Google = No point of Dragon.
after i have logged in on this web site: http://dark-warriors.net
and hit my account at the top of the page, i get this error message
"Error 128
This page has been blocked by Dark Warriors to ensure the safety and security of your account and the accounts of others. Please make sure your reffering URL (the page you just came from) is a Dark Warriors related page (make sure you have a www in your URL, just ‘dark-warriors.net’ wont work).
Still getting the error? Chances are you’ve got a firewall or some sort of antivirus software that blocks Dark Warriors from seeing your reffering URL. You’ll need to disable it or add Dark Warriors to the ‘white’ list, or you wont be able to play."
however i don’t get the error message in google chrome which is now using the same core as dragon.
also on this part of the site: Dark-Warriors.Net the chat is jumpy but it’s not in chrome
I don’t use Chrome. Does it have the option to block referrer headers? Because Dragon does.
Since you can’t whitelist sites from this feature, I’d suggest disabling it and using an extension such as NOREF to handle your referrer blocking duties, because it has whitelisting capability.
no chrome doesn’t have the option. i don’t use chrome either. disabling the suppression fixed the issue. thanks. i think it’s ridiculous to have to use an extension just to get whitelisting for suppressed referrer but i may do it as long as they don’t have whitelisting in dragon. adding whitelisting to wishlist for dragon
I agree that more configurability would be nice.
Google releases 16.0.912.75
Security fixes and rewards: Please see the Chromium security page for more detail. Note that the referenced bugs may be kept private until a majority of our users are up to date with the fix
[106672] High CVE-2011-3921: Use-after-free in animation frames. Credit to Boris Zbarsky of Mozilla.
[107128] High CVE-2011-3919: Heap-buffer-overflow in libxml. Credit to Jüri Aedla.
[108006] High CVE-2011-3922: Stack-buffer-overflow in glyph handling. Credit to Google Chrome Security Team (Cris Neckar).
The bug [108006] was detected using AddressSanitizer.
Full details about what changes have been made in this release are available in the SVN revisions log. Interested in switching to another channel? Find out how. If you find a new issue, please let us know by filing a bug.
Just updated to 16.2.1.0 :-TU
Awaiting official word and changelog please