CIS v4.1.......CIS Premium!

[kail]

Это - только изменение названия, чтобы отразить его статус. Премия все еще будет свободна.

I sure hope that makes any sense. Google. :)

[Black_Star]

What do mean under word “still”?

[kail]

Still free. It continues to be free. CIS is renamed to CIS Premium. But, it is still free.

How’s that?

[Kyle142]

sounds good :-TU

[Black_Star]

Thanks. Good luck. New GUI terrible. Red color looks like danger. Maybe return GUI from CIS 3.14 (very beautiful GUI).

[fazio93]

@bequick post:60

No, no, I was asking about AV and program update of 4.1.

Ah. I haven’t heard anything about it for this release, but who knows. As kail mentioned, there is a work around if you do not know.

@panic post:3

Setting the AV to update at user defined intervals can be indirectly achieved, but it would be better if it was built into CIS.

1. Open CIS and click ANTIVIRUS → SCANNER SETTINGS

2. On the REAL TIME SCANNING tab, disable AUTOMATICALLY UPDATE VIRUS DATABASE BEFORE SCANNING.

3. On the MANUAL SCANNING tab, disable AUTOMATICALLY UPDATE VIRUS DATABASE BEFORE SCANNING.

4. On the SCHEDULED SCANNING tab, enable AUTOMATICALLY UPDATE VIRUS DATABASE BEFORE SCANNING and disable SHOW SCANNING PROGRESS

5. On the SCHEDULED SCANNING tab, disable SHOW SCANNING PROGRESS

6. Set up a series of scheduled scans that only scans a single innocuous file (e.g. a shortcut on your desktop) with a regularity that suits you and your environment.

I currently use this method with a series of scheduled scans set to scan a single desktop shortcut at 4AM, 8AM, 12AM, 4PM, 8PM and 12PM.

Yes, this is a workaround, but, equally, yes it works.

Hope this helps,
Ewen

[Victor_Popescu]

What about this !?

https://forums.comodo.com/news-announcements-feedback-cis/heads-up-on-cis-v41-incase-anyone-missed-it-t56794.0.html

If I understand corectly, it seems that we will be able to update from 3.14 to 4.1 !

[fazio93]

@Victor Popescu post:70

What about this !?

https://forums.comodo.com/news-announcements-feedback-cis/heads-up-on-cis-v41-incase-anyone-missed-it-t56794.0.html

If I understand corectly, it seems that we will be able to update from 3.14 to 4.1 !

Btw: [b]After[/b] CIS 4.1 is out, CIS 3.14 users will start auto updating to CIS 4.1."

That doesn’t specify whether v4.1 will have the option, or that the option will be available in the version after v4.1. From what Melih has said, it sounds like it won’t be this version. I don’t know for sure though, it could be.

[Tooby]

@Victor Popescu post:70

What about this !?

https://forums.comodo.com/news-announcements-feedback-cis/heads-up-on-cis-v41-incase-anyone-missed-it-t56794.0.html

If I understand corectly, it seems that we will be able to update from 3.14 to 4.1 !

Auto update could happen with 4.1, or a later version. I modified the post to be more clearer.

Thx.

[prettyhot]

@pykko post:39

Awesome, this a good news

Still not out today ??? ??? ???

[catalinsecurity]

This is greate :ilovecomodo: :comodo110:

[languy99]

Don’t worry about it guys/girls it’s coming real soon I can assure you of that.

[Tooby]

https://forums.comodo.com/news-announcements-feedback-cis/cis-premium-41-info-should-be-out-next-monday-or-tuesday-t56868.0.html;msg399786#msg399786

[patrice58]

@Endymion post:57

It is not that your words contribute anything that will have such project come faster…

Didn’t the thought occur to you? Perhaps a delay is not enough for everybody to stir up another “FREE” controversy lookalike :-La

Words can’t do much so your right I can’t do much to make the project come along faster but as I have said before my main beef is that everybody (or most people) remembered to forget about the BB (That was after all due in this version). I have not.

As for the delay there is a great way of fixing that…Be on time.

[patrice58]

@andyman35 post:58

While you’re correct that the behaviour blocker has slipped to quite a degree,do you really think it’d have been wise to integrate yet another new technology into CIS while the sandbox has yet to mature? I’d rather see the current product working as flawlessly as possible before adding a new set of potential issues.

As can be seen from the recent fairly disastrous attempts at BB offerings from Alwil and Avira,it’s a technology that needs to be developed extensively to get working right,far better to do so without sandbox bugs clouding the issue IMO.

I see your point and I agree.

[Mnb10]

Is there finally a native IPv6 support?

It would be also nice if you replace the aggressive red background color by default to blue.

[bequick]

@Mnb10 post:79

Is there finally a native IPv6 support?

It would be also nice if you replace the aggressive red background color by default to blue.

Or black:

[attachment deleted by admin]

[Mnb10]

@bequick post:80

Or black:

Yes. Indeed, that looks really good. :-TU

[bequick]

The black color symbolizes the funeral of the malware.

[Endymion]

@patrice58 post:77

Words can’t do much so your right I can’t do much to make the project come along faster but as I have said before my main beef is that everybody (or most people) remembered to forget about the BB (That was after all due in this version). I have not.

As for the delay there is a great way of fixing that…Be on time.

I see you are arguing based on a version number… Whereas V4.0 was released 3 months ago it looks like you meant that the ETA was 3 months.

Thanks for the beef but don’t forget to put off the fire or the smoke will get in you eyes. 88)