Anti virus which i use has “Enable HTTP checking” when i turn it off i had much more smaller ping time and surf, opening pages etc have better response time. I would like to know does Comodo FW have something similar what can increase ping time? If it have it to turn it off too.
I set-up exactly how it is in this topic: https://forums.comodo.com/install-setup-configuration-help/few-questions-about-fw-t51268.0.html
I never tested it with Comodo or other security programs in the past but yes every residential security program will influence ping and page load speed.
Just try for yourself and let us know Comodo compares to others.
I can try to turn off Comodo. I do not basic options for what are let alone to test setting by setting. 88)
Tested ping time to 10 different servers with CIS both ON and OFF. Only dicsernible difference was to one server whose pping time when CIS was OFF was 432ms and when ON was 446ms.
Most of the good firewalls nowadays are pretty good at reducing their network impact. 
Ewen 
Most of the good firewalls nowadays are pretty good at reducing their network impact.
Does Comodo good enough ;D? I am joking, i read many good and only good suggestion for this FW and many people are satisfied.
I must test it. Because my ping is still for a bit bigger, it is about 100-200ms. I do not say it is because FW i just want to exclude 1st fw and then other applications which may this problem with the ping.
please use the traceroute program (tracert) from the command-line to find out where the delays start to increase.
Also try to ping the first device as close as possible to your pc, like for example your wireless access point or your router and see how they compare…
Use -n 20 for testing 20 packets in stead of 4 or -t to do unlimited testing until you CTRL-C out of it…
Please, could you be kindly and to tell me is this all ok?
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4665_14.2.2010ned1.19.28.jpg
How much i know the 1st one is from my pc to router then to my provider … These first few are the most important to know is all OK from me to provider, right?
http://www.speedtest.net/result/716080979.png
http://www.pingtest.net/result/10361226.png
Few days ago i had much more bad results.
Hi
Well your “Local” network is fine, seen from your PC your default gateway is 192.168.1.1 and that responds within 1ms so that’s good, and the “next hop” is already your Internet Providers device so the first latency increase starts there which in this case suggests a “low” bandwidth internet connection, these latency’s should not be seen on let’s say a 1Mbit down 512kb up connection… can you please provide the speed your provider sells you?
And if things start to slowdown please use the tracert command again to find where the latency increases compared to this out put (save the image somewhere so you can compare)…
My net connection is: ADSL 2Mbit download/192bit upload.
And if things start to slowdown please use the tracert command again to find where the latency increases compared to this out put (save the image somewhere so you can compare)...
Do you mean several times to test it?
Yes test several times but also on the time when it’s more slow then “normal” so you can see where the delay is increasing…
Do you have access to your DSL modem, can you read out the DSL settings like the speed it has trained on with the DSLAM and other parameters like Signal Noise ratio etc?
I tend to think this latency is to high for such a connection.
Also how’s your DSL cabled to the router? distance to splitter, length of cable from splitter to modem etc?
Ok, i will test several times. I wont at once.
This is router TP LINK TD-8811. Yes, i have access, it open a page into browser and there are many different configurations.
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4703_15.2.2010pon0.32.55.jpg
I do not know where is these:“DSLAM and other parameters like Signal Noise ratio” :-[
The router in new and all cables which i use are from box. I connected with LAN cable not with USB. All cables are short except telephone cable which i think it is not necessary to be long, right?
Can you post screenies from Statistics, WAN, ATM & ADSL ?
If it contains your external ip please blurr that out
Cabling is important, from the point where the DSL carrier enters your house, you should try to keep the wires as short as possible
[Telephone Line Socket]–[Splitter]–[Telephone]
|
[xDSL modem]—[LAN]
The shorter the wires the better the DSL signal will be, if you have a very long wire or low quality between the Telephone Socket and the splitter or between the splitter and the modem/router it will influence the line quality…
I am sorry because i answered several days later…
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4991_23.2.2010uto1.48.34.jpg
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4990_23.2.2010uto1.47.52.jpg
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4989_23.2.2010uto1.47.27.jpg
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4988_23.2.2010uto1.47.02.jpg
I see there are several tabs with the same name which you mentioned to took SS. I think these one are not so important other have some configurations i will upload those too.
I will buy a new telephone cable. Because one is very long. I know for electricy it is better shorter cable but i didn’t know it is important too for telephone.
Here are two more pictures which i think you thought on them:
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4993_23.2.2010uto2.02.09.jpg
http://image-bb.com/out.php/t4992_23.2.2010uto2.01.33.jpg
well ~ 55ms round trip seems pretty normal on a 128kpbs link, so your 192kps up should show similar values at least to the next hop, depending on how much traffic you have running on the link of course.
See this link for some nice reading on how to interpret all these nice values
Thank you for the answer and i will read the link.
In your opinion you think it is all ok and that is max what can i expect from my speed and provider?
btw i read somewhere to use this patch to turn off QOS
http://www.speedguide.net/files/vista/SG_Vista_TcpIp_patch.cmd
Do you suggest me?
Hi,
Furthermore, by default windows reserves 20% of the connection bandwidth for QoS traffic, this is the case regardless of whether QoS is activated or not.HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Win dows\Psched and EDIT or ADD the DWORD NonBestEffortLimit and set it to 0
If you are connected with a 100Mbit LAN adapter to a router this would reserve 20% of the 100Mbit, you won’t find that anywhere near your slowest path 2048 down 192 up, if you know how to handle the registry you could try to see if it helps, but i have my doubts…
If you have an “adapter” this on your pc that is the direct connection for Internet access like for example a USB device or a PPP adapter over Ethernet THEN this could provide useful.
I searched for the path…
http://thumbnails25.imagebam.com/6959/b750a269584207.gif
Do i have to add Psched or…?
If you have an "adapter" this on your pc that is the direct connection for Internet access like for example a USB device or a PPP adapter over Ethernet THEN this could provide useful.
I am not sure what do you mean… My router is connected over LAN.
Please be careful with the registry, it can render your system useless if you make mistakes…
You could create the folder Psched and create the mentioned key under it.
But as your connected over LAN with 100Mbit the Qos won’t reserve traffic unless you go over 80Mbps traffic, and you will never make that on a 2Mbit Internet link, so i would not put time and effort in that…
You can also “untick” the Qos Service on the network adapters properties, this should also disable this behavior for the network interface.
If you said so it is better to do not touch nothing.
I just turn off this:
http://www.yourimage.name/data/TN/2010/02/25/fde31fe9aeeb818266ec4dbaff26fc30.jpg
You mean on that?
From you opinion do you think it is almost all ok with my connection and i do not have to lose time anymore and try to extract perfect from it 88)?
Well i would also untick “internet protocol version 6” and both "Link-Layer Discovery enties.
If you have just one PC on you network it’s of no use… only causing extra “windows noise” on the local link.
The only thing that is important is the short cable, the shorter the DSL connection is next to the point where it enters the building the better the signal will be.
I don’t think that there are much more things to do with the current bandwidth.
Are there other tastes from your provider providing more upload speed? that’s really killing at the moment.
Once the 192kbps is filled your total speed will drop to this, because the “download speed” of 2Mbit can no longer be reached.
One other thing to consider is that the connection is probably over subscribed which means you share bandwidth with other users, so depending on their number of downloads etc your speed could be less then the “sold” rate.
See it like this
— Customer 1 ==> |
— Customer 2 ==> |
— Customer 3 ==> | DSLAM | <==> uplink say 10Mbps max <==> Central Infra ISP
— Customer x ==> |
— Customer 10 ==> |
If they sell every customer a 1Mpbs bandwidth then it would be 1:1 no over subscription
Every other higher bandwidth product is oversubscribed.
Overhere we would have a 2Mbit down with at least 512 kbps up…
