Hi,
Just installed Comodo Personal Firewall, so still getting to know it.
One question (I’ve searched the forum but not found anything) is it possible to block websites by url?
I guess it would be a Network Rule, but I’ve tried a couple of variations and cannot get it to work.
Cheers
Mike
I don’t think it is possible to block a site by its URL. But you could block the site by blocking the site’s hostname TCP Out at port 80.
This may already be in the feature request list, however. 
I just did a quick test and you can block a site by name.
The rule parameters are as follows;
Action : Block
Direction : In/Out
Source : Your LAN Zone or individual IP
Remote - Host : www.something_or_other.com
Protocol : Any
To make this rule work, I had to move it ABOVE the default ALLOW-IN-ZONE-ANY-ANY rule. If it was below this rule in the list the named site would not be blocked because it would be a valid response to an originating request. If the BLOCK rule is moved above the default rule, only the named site is blocked, other sites can still be accessed.
Have a ■■■■■ and see if this works for you.
Hope this helps,
Ewen 
(WCF3) (WCF3) (WCF3)
Not that I didn’t believe Panic but I had to try it for myself, and it works :o
I didn’t believe me either so I tested. 
This will block every port matching the hostname specified.
If you only want to block HTTP and HTTPs (Web access - if it’s not on a custom port), make two rules, one for TCP OUT 80 and one for TCP OUT 443.
Have Fun!
Thanks memo. So the rule parameters to block a site by URL should be as follows;
Action : Block
Direction : In/Out
Source : Your LAN Zone or individual IP
Remote - Host : www.something_or_other.com
Source Port : Any
Remote Port - A set of ports :80,443
Are these correct? Sorry, can’t test myself at the mo, on a very controlled LAN.
Ewen
It won’t work with any Sock-Type connection.
IE/Firefox/YM/Whatever…
*. Only valid at Direct Connection!
*. …even tried using IP, instead of TCP/UDP
Well…?
#UPDATE#
Egemen’s answer the question at this post: https://forums.comodo.com/index.php/topic,193.msg5505.html#msg5505
*. …guess there’s no cure for the “dynamic-tunnel”, then.