Hi,
I said its a beta product, its just for information, with comodo leaktest O0 CIS 4 scored 200/340.
thanks for your work guys. 
It will probably change.
certainly… ;D
How did you run CLT? In the sandbox, or did you allow it to run with elevated privileges?
I can get 340/340 in the sandbox, and configuration Proactive Security. Windows XP.
I was able to get 320/340 with an almost “out of the box” config. The only real change I made was to the “let explorer.exe do whatever the hell it wants to do” rule. Screen shot attached.
Ewen 
[attachment deleted by admin]
tested out of the sandbox with elevated privilege.
For me a leak-test was testing out the sandbox…its my opinion
You can do that, if you disable the sandbox, or make CLT an Isolated application i D+ and a Blocked application i FW.
Tested again under admin on XP sp3, V4 proactive defaults and clt Isolated(D+)/blocked(Fw) run using right-click sandbox:
vulnerable 7. Invasion: PhysicalMemory
vulnerable 24. Impersonation: DDE
still no clue why I fail different tests… ???
BTW does anybody know why CLT trigger an elevation alert? It is neither an installer nor it got an elevation manifest. ???
EDIT: clt.exe manfest explicitly request admin privileges (requestedExecutionLevel: requireAdministrator)
The highest I can get is 320/340 in proactive mode running in sandbox.Out of sandbox 240
I get 340/340 without Sandbox. I used proactive settings, changed in D+ from Comodo Internet Security to Comodo Files/Folders, with all protection settings enabled. D+ is in safe mode; trusted apps and block unknown requests and create rules for safe apps is enabled.
I am using Vista x86 with all updates.
[attachment deleted by admin]