I have no comment relative to Melih's article, excepting of course that it his not the property of HyJaxLTD, and consequently that Melih is free to comment further or not, particularly when "asked" to do so from double posting, in the same time when, and opposite as what is being said, other people also are allowed to write their own comments.
I am nevertheless not off topic for being entitled to a right to answer:
'Calm down Angry Clown' is where you stopped reading. Grow up. I was being attacked for some poor lil person deciding it was completly personal.
Anyone reading the topic where the quote cames from
shall realize that no one, including myself, made any personal attack.
HyJaxLTD is the one talking of "angry clown", "poor lil person" and so on, and presents as only arguments "Microsoft said", only contemptuously answering to anyone else that his arguments are "wiki life", but without ascertaining, even when politely asked, what he says with appropriate sources, thus making his arguments having not less, but not more value then those systematically presented as "coming from wiki', without either any evidence of this assumption.
Who attacks who, who is systematically offensive and contemptuous in whatever he writes?
I am quite surprised that this pemanent breaching of forum rules (attacks "ad hominem", and of course under the belt) is not moderated.
I stopped reading your posts after this ugly remark
(...)you are "communicating" with users here in such disgusting manner(...)
i shall not myself answer to whatever HyJavxLTD, if not paranoïa, at least complex of inferiority, might lead him to overstate and, repeating what i said, i have only used here my right to answer to personal offensive words like "angry clown" and "poor lil person".