Is it ethical to claim to be "independent" while providing data to "end user" disguised as "independent" with ZERO validation/auditing?
Time has come to arm the end users with information about the "reality" of these tests. It is no longer "ok" to disseminate information and pretend to be "independent". Its border line illegal to do what AV-Comparatives is doing according to FCC guidelines.
And when confronted to "flush" them with the offer of auditing, once again they find a way out, how original!
How about, for once, be transparent and give end users validated and audited data?
Its totally unethical for AV-Comparatives.org to continue to provide these unsubstantiated, un-validated and un-audited information to public. Today they are NOT certified. Today they are still disseminating this misleading information. Shame on them!
I am sick of people who open their mouth and feed end users with "poison", time to stand up for end users! and I am sick of people who aid them without understanding what they are doing by aiding them!