Sorry for jumping in - but hey: Isn't it time to stop this trolling game??
I think it would be unethical for AV-Comparatives to put out any Test Results without auditing/validating them now.
Talking about ethics? Talking about trust? So what...
What about releasing some private mails?
Is this ethical? And do you show all of the story or only the part that fits to your argumentation? Only you know...
What about the released parts of the NDA?
Is this the whole story, or again only the part that fits to your argumentation? Only you know...
We don't know because AV-C have enough moral and don't jumps in your public flaming.
Everybody who understands a little bit knows what the on-demand test is about: reactive signature scanning. Point. So why you took part at all? Nobody said that this test claims to measure whole product efficiency.
The money argument: Look at all the other big testing companies. Why don't you critizise them?
AV-C said that they are in the process of ISO certification. And to do that without sponsoring from single one vendor is good! Very good. So - be patient and please show how generous you are: If they get the ISO certification donate your 50k to "SOS-Kinderdorf".
Any word on that?