quote cocopara
"If avira actually fails so hard they actually only have scanning minor parts of the folder rather then scanning it as a whole then that is avira's problem. Most people will understand heuristics but not that.
HOWEVER, how do you know it would detect anymore?"
-----------------
what? the tester made this setting. dont you look on the pictures in the video? every person is able to understand "scan all" (what is heuristic? lol? just a joke, but.... "all" is a usuall word even for a kid). and why should someone set his SCANNER (not the guard, but even the guard doesnt has an impact on performance with "scan all") to do exceptional scanning? first of all if he wants to test?
btw, having 0,08 percent less scan effectivity (by one(!) try with exceptions(!)) than another product has while running several times and having to use "a cloud" (which had time to react for an hour, because the first scan lasts so long in comodo).... isnt anything like failing. look at the test results without seeing the useless company names. or change the names lol.
even a blind chicken would find one day a corn, when you let it run often enough

. thats not real testing. you see?
and who "fails actually so hard"? dude, comodo found after more than one try less than 0,08 percent more stuff. and why is it so important for you that someone wins? i dont care who wins. because i am not a fan boy, and i dont be part of a compnay. so who cares?
dont mix "reading a test result" with "having an opinion about a companies product".
i dont know if it would detect more with that setting. but i know that it WOULD scan all at least. what do you try to convince me on? THE TEST wasnt consequent. read again: THE TEST.
comodo and avira should do everything to protect their customers. they shouldnt concentrate on to win competitions! its no sport, its security. its no difference if comodo or anyone else says: YOUR program is not good.... it is allways the same: marketing. nothing else. dont care, but look on the test-results and interpretate them objective.
guess what, i would choose avira after this test