COMODO Leak Test Suite Updated Version

[larlyles]

I know this is a Comodo designed test and that Defense+ is an integral part of CIS, but by relying so much on Defense+, is the leak test suite really testing the CIS Firewall? It seems like the HIPS part of CIS is doing most of the work in these leak tests. By choosing 'Allow', aren't you bypassing the Defense+ part of CIS and then testing only the Firewall part of the program, which gives the CIS Firewall a much lower score? Is this a convoluted way of looking at this leak test suite in regards to the CIS program, or does the question have merit?

BTW, I scored 340 out of 340, with the Firewall and Defense+ set to Safe Mode and all the Monitor Settings checked. The Advanced Predefined Security Policies Trusted Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes'. The Windows System Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes', except Windows/WinEvent Hooks was left at "No'. Isolated Applications Protection Settings were all left at 'No', and the Limited Applications were all set to 'Yes'. With these settings I didn't get any Defense+ popups to answer. I still have to wonder, was the CIS Firewall really being tested by this leak test suite, or was Defense+ doing most of the work because of the advanced settings chosen?

[prandi63]

Hye,
i got today,after a click on D+ computer security policy under ''treat as'' a deeper menu as ''access rights'' and ''protection setting'' i put all in blocked(both menu) and i got 340/340 but no internet page shown.
Closed it and set clt in trusted app then i try again program got again message select installer and update and i got again 30/340
Changing again in custom and i got again 340/340
Is that right???
I think test like this it is not good ,otherwise i have to block all programs and then maybe i got pc blocked
I get confusing

prandi63

[ganda]

Hye,
i got today,after a click on D+ computer security policy under ''treat as'' a deeper menu as ''access rights'' and ''protection setting'' i put all in blocked(both menu) and i got 340/340 but no internet page shown.
Closed it and set clt in trusted app then i try again program got again message select installer and update and i got again 30/340
Changing again in custom and i got again 340/340
Is that right???
I think test like this it is not good ,otherwise i have to block all programs and then maybe i got pc blocked
I get confusing

prandi63

huh errr,what's the point of creating rule for CLT?
i think you should assume the CLT as a new unknown application.
and then you run it, and see how CIS handle it,and when the popup shows up, you answer accordingly. 

[easter]

Hello Comodo folks and staff

FYI i tried the new CLT Test and am very happy to report that EQS Beta3 w/ Alcyon's Crushing Rulesets blowed this test out of the water.

In conjunction with PG 3.5 & MAMUTU only as well as my little Kerio 2.15 firewall.

Can you come up with a more strenous test in the future? These are interesting.

Thanks EASTER

[yashkhan]

I know this is a Comodo designed test and that Defense+ is an integral part of CIS, but by relying so much on Defense+, is the leak test suite really testing the CIS Firewall? It seems like the HIPS part of CIS is doing most of the work in these leak tests. By choosing 'Allow', aren't you bypassing the Defense+ part of CIS and then testing only the Firewall part of the program, which gives the CIS Firewall a much lower score? Is this a convoluted way of looking at this leak test suite in regards to the CIS program, or does the question have merit?

BTW, I scored 340 out of 340, with the Firewall and Defense+ set to Safe Mode and all the Monitor Settings checked. The Advanced Predefined Security Policies Trusted Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes'. The Windows System Applications Protection Settings were all set to 'Yes', except Windows/WinEvent Hooks was left at "No'. Isolated Applications Protection Settings were all left at 'No', and the Limited Applications were all set to 'Yes'. With these settings I didn't get any Defense+ popups to answer. I still have to wonder, was the CIS Firewall really being tested by this leak test suite, or was Defense+ doing most of the work because of the advanced settings chosen?

hii. a good point buddy. some leak tests are meant for firewall and some are meant for hips and some for both. so if we disable defence plus and run the tests the firewall should atleast generate the pop ups for the tests meant for firewall tests. but i dont know if there are leak tests meant for firewall only in comodo leak tests.

thanxx

naren

[JaMokey]

170/340

All i have on my computer is Spybot Search & Destroy 

[mjj09]

XP SP3 in Safe Mode

340/340

[Graham1]

Hi

Any news when this "online type" leak test suite will be available?

[Graham1]

Any news when this "online type" leak test suite will be available?

Bump .

[7testing]

thanks. you are a  gentleman.

[devenroy]

Hi all,
I m running windows 7 x 64bit edition.
I have CIS & Iobit security 360 installed on my system
After running test i found "Impersonation: DDE Vulnerable"
How can i fix this?
My total score is 330/340.

[JoWa]

Like some AVs, IE8 doesn't like CLT.

[AyeAyeCaptain]

Well in proactive mode along with on-access AV and Paranoid D+ I got 160/340

And in Internet Security Mode, along with on-access and Paranoid D+ 320/340

PS- also had UAC off, as use Metaboli, but turned back on and will turn off when playing games only (even though lot of hassle).

EDIT/ADD: Now got 330/340 , how do I protect against Invasion: FileDrop, that is the only one I failed now.

[devenroy]

coat.dlll got trojan generic virus? its detected by cloud panda security.

[Endymion]

coat.dlll got trojan generic virus? its detected by cloud panda security.

Assuming an umbrella won't solve that either, does Panda have a way report this False positive?